Table 1: Performance Summary.
No.
|
Avg. Return
|
Avg. Annualized
|
Avg. Holding Period
|
21
|
50%
|
111%
|
211 days
|
Table 2: Source of the stocks:
Sources
|
Web & publication
|
Deeply valued
|
Acquire candidates
|
Misc. screens
|
Short squeezed
|
No.
|
4
|
3
|
3
|
10
|
1
|
Annualized Return
|
75%
|
53%
|
204%
|
115%
|
164%
|
Stocks
|
ADM,BSX, C, EMN
|
CSCO, CSCO, MSFT
|
CAMP, FFCH, ADES
|
ACAT,BIIB,CUZ,DGI,NSIT,STRZA,USNA,OMX,DLTR
|
DECK
|
Web and Publication.
There are four (from a total of
21) stocks are selected from my articles off the web, magazines and newspaper.
When I was convinced that there was great appreciation, I bought that stock
without any further evaluation. I was lazy and you should do some evaluation.
Need to distinguish whether the authors are pumping-and-dumping the stocks they
recommended.
Deeply-valued stocks.
Three of the stocks were quite
deeply valued. I placed an order with prices about 5% lower than the market
prices betting they are still on its way down a little. Three out of six orders
were successfully executed.
I doubled my normal bet on most
of these stocks (CSCO about 4 times) and the stocks with high fundamental
metrics. As of 5/2013, these deeply-valued stocks have not realized its
potential values and they’re the under-performers in the group. However, the
average 53% annualized return is nothing to ignore!
Candidates to be acquired.
There are quite a few candidates
that would be acquired by other (usually larger) companies in the early
recovery of the market cycle (a phase defined by me). However, with plenty of
easy money around due to low interest rates and the high corporate cash
reserves, it extends the acquisition craze to 2013. This phase will end when the
Fed begins to tighten the money supply. These stocks represent the better
return from the group and I should have doubled bet on all of them even they
normally are smaller and unknown companies.
The potential candidates to be
acquired are usually smaller companies with a technological edge and/or a good
customer base.
Miscellaneous screens.
A screen consists of criteria in
searching stocks such as P/E < 20. There are 10 stocks from miscellaneous
screens (same as searches). The performance of each screen is further
analyzed. It is better to use the
screens that had better performances most recently.
Short squeeze.
The short squeeze happens
when the stocks that have been over-sold by the shorters (Chapter 56:
Fundamental Metrics and Chapter 62: Selling Short). When the stock is over-sold, those
seeking a short position cannot find the extra shares lent to be shorted and
sometimes the shorters are forced to cover their shorts due to the high
expenses of shorting that stock (interests and dividends).
If the company is not heading towards
bankruptcy, any good news would boost the stock price. This is the typical
situation, but it does not work all of the time. TSLA was a recent example as
of 5/2013 that works for short squeeze. However, I bet TSLA will fall again
from its unjustified high price of over $100 per share. Only time can tell.
Increase stocks for better appreciation potential
The confidence in my predictions for CSCO's future is so secure that I
have set aside four times my typical investment, and then 2x for BSX and STRZA.
All scored high in my scoring system described in my other book Scoring Stocks.
I would never set aside more money for potential laggards!
Table 3: Score (using the score system in my book Scoring Stocks:
Avg. Score
|
Foreign Country
|
Insider Purchase
|
3.00
|
0
|
1
|
The average score of 9 stocks is
3 and it is the passing grade. Some of the stocks have not been analyzed and
hence have not been scored as described before. The stocks that have not been
scored usually have good appreciation potential, deeply-valued for first
impression, and / or recommended by convincing articles. The scoring system is
a guide line and we do not have to follow it religiously. The scoring system is
based on my book Scoring Stocks (from amazon.com).
There is not a single foreign
stock in this group. I usually do not trust the financial statements of the
smaller, foreign countries. The next chapter will tell you to skip most of
them.
Insider Purchase (Chapter 56) is
only 1 out of 21. The data base is too small for any conclusion. From my past
data, Insiders’ Purchases with purchase prices close to the market prices is a
good predicator.
Table 4: Sectors:
Sector
|
Tech
|
Mine
|
Health Care, equip and drug
|
Consumer goods
|
Finance
|
Retail
|
Misc.
|
No.
|
6
|
0
|
4
|
3
|
3
|
2
|
3
|
Annual
|
77%
|
|
230%
|
102%
|
60%
|
57%
|
78%
|
Stocks
|
CAMP, CSCO,CSCO,
DGI,MSFT,NSIT
|
|
BIIB,BSX,
USNA,ADES
|
ACAT,ADM
DECK
|
C,FFCH,
BANR
|
OMX,
DLTR
|
CUZ,STRZA
EMN
|
No comments:
Post a Comment