Book 15: The economy
The economy usually follows the
market in six months except the current market due to the excessive printing of
money. I am political neutral as most investors should be. I criticize more on
the current government disregarding which political party is in charge.
I The economy
1 My Coconut Theory
Coconut Theory
In a tropical island, every one
sleeps under a coconut tree assigned to him. He wakes up only when a coconut falls
on his head once in a while. He eats the coconut and goes back to sleep. He is
lazy due to the nice weather (no need to find shelter) and the nice resource
(the coconut tree). He is happy and rich by his own standard. However, he is
lazy, fat, and stupid due to the lack of any need to work, exercise, and think
out of his ‘perfect’ environment.
The worst that happens to the
natives is borrowing coconuts from other natives with the coconut tree as
collateral or cut down the coconut tree to make a canoe without plans to
replenish coconuts in the future.
This is a simple theory. It can
be used to explain how and why many countries are rich, poor, and continue to
be so. Let’s check how this theory stacks up with countries.
U.S.A.
The U.S. is one of the richest countries due to its development, highly educated citizens, hard-working immigrants and the huge natural resources per capita (i.e. having a lot of coconuts in my theory). The U.S. is declining as we spend more time enjoying our wealth (borrowing coconuts so he can eat more) rather than creating more wealth (i.e. not planting new coconut trees in my theory).
The wealth is
equivalent to the bountiful of coconut trees that were available originally and
the many that were planted by our ancestors. There were fewer natives to
consume the total number of coconuts, so there was a surplus of coconuts grown,
eventually to be given away (as welfare and entitlements). Many of our citizens
have no incentive to plant more coconut trees (work) when they have unlimited
coconuts to them (generous welfare).
Because of
WW2, most coconut trees in the world were destroyed while ours were isolated
from the war. We were rich to ship our better coconuts to the rest of the
world.
God gave us
plenty of natural resources, good soil and climatic wealth (coconuts hidden
under the land) and hopefully we continue to be wealthy. Unfortunately, we’re
now consumers (of coconuts) instead of producers (planting new coconut trees).
Norway
Norway is the richest to its population
group (3 millions) while Brunei is richest in its own population group. Norway is
rich due to its rich resources and its intelligently governed wealth. I hate to
compare any country to Norway as most likely we are comparing Apples to Melons.
From its long
coast line Norway has rich off-shore oil fields and abundant fish exports which
is second in the world-- only 6% of its export, after China but far, far #1 per
capita wise. Because of the world's oil addiction and food dependence secures
its income flow.
Peru has a long coast line, but it is not wealthy. My theory does not apply fully here, as there are always exceptions. It could be Norway’s educated citizens, close location to its trade partners and buying assets around the world (planting more coconut trees). The dividend payments allow Norway to prosper for decades. They have about 600 billion sovereign fund to be shared by 3 million citizens. Simple math!
Iceland
Some smart guys suggested cutting down all the coconut trees to make canoes so they can earn a rich life by fishing. The world blindly loans them with coconuts. When the fishing fails, their land is lost with no coconuts and no coconut trees left. Do not bet all the coconuts in one venture and always have an exit strategy.
Singapore and SE Asia
Singapore is rich due to its important location for the sea route for trade and commerce, as well as being the cultural intersection between the east and the west and its industrious citizens (most are Chinese). When the hard-working folks land on a land of coconuts (i.e. resources), they naturally become rich.
Mekong River
is a good resource providing fishing, irrigation, transportation, and fertile
land in the delta for SE Asia. Hence, SE Asia should be rich, and at the same
time attracts hard-working immigrants from India and China to enhance their
wealth. However, the river is being polluted by industries and the future is
cloudy.
Japan
Japan has few
natural resources. Its only resource is the educated and hard-working citizens.
With a decreasing population and the policy not welcoming immigrants, Japan
will face problems.
Haiti
Haiti used to
have enough coconuts for its small population. French imported African slaves
to the sugar cane plantation and changed the allocation of natural resources
per capita. Coupled with frequent natural disasters and bad governance, Haiti
becomes the poorest country in the world.
UAE
When the west
helped UAE to explore its oil resources (the hidden coconuts under the sand)
about 50 years ago, UAE becomes one of the richest countries. She expands in different
areas and it could be over-expanded. When the oil dries up in 100 or so years
and/or the shale energy competes better, they could be in big trouble. [Update:
the problem appears as of 1/2015.]
Russia
Russia is a
country full of resources (coconuts). Its citizens become lazy having a good
time under the ‘coconut’ tree. Chinese are just the opposite. That’s why the
Russians hire the hard-working Chinese to tender farm in the border while they
enjoy life with plenty of Vodka J.
The primary
reason why USSR fell was the temporary low prices of their resources oil and
timber (coconuts). Trying to be #1 was another reason.
China
China has
roughly 20% of the world population, but it has far less than 20% of the world
resources (coconuts). For example, it has only 6% of the world land area. The
situation was worsened in the last 300 years during the Opium Wars, and then
semi colonization by the eight countries (led by Brits, the opium pushers). It
bankrupted China by their colonial masters. It caused massive migration to
escape from the land without coconuts. It was followed by WW2, war lord era and
then the bad governance. Their bitter lessons ensure this generation and the
next generation to work hard and be smart. When they do not have ‘coconut trees’
(the colonial masters cut most of them down), you have to work hard or die.
China ranks
#2 in the economy. It is only important to its trading partners. Its own
citizens care about their living standard which is about the middle in the rank
of all countries.
Greece
Greece has
its natural resources: tourism (coconut). Euro gives them unlimited borrowing.
Olympics boosted their dumb ego. The result is bankruptcy.
Ancient
civilizations too
Greece, Iran,
India, China and Italy are among the oldest civilizations. Most do not do well
in today’s economy and many of their citizens have immigrated to other
countries. My theory suggests that they have exhausted their coconuts (farm
land and metals) throughout the long history. Hence, they have to migrate to
lands with more coconuts. To illustrate, there is a huge discrepancy in natural
resources (oil, metal and farm land) between China and the U.S., which has a
relatively short history.
Corporations
too
Microsoft was a tougher company with
more innovations fifteen years ago than today. However, they are enjoying easy
profitability of upgrades of Windows and Office (coconuts planted by their
ancestors). For a long time, she only has one successful new product, the Xbox.
Her managers are counting their bonuses instead of taking risk. The Coconut
Theory works again.
Rich families too
It is very
rare to have rich families that last over three generations. The first
generation grows the wealth (planting coconuts), the second generation enjoys
the wealth, and the third or fourth generation usually becomes poor due to the
easy life.
Conclusion
So far, no
one tells me that this theory has been ‘discovered’ by others. Shamelessly I
claim it is mine. To me, it is just common sense.
Afterthoughts
·
I did not have a coconut tree (i.e. financial aid or
money from my dad), and that is why I worked two jobs in my first summer while
attending college here. The first one was a bus boy job from 5 pm to 10 pm. The
other one was cleaning slot machines from 4 am to noon for 5 and usually 7 days
a week. Lack of coconut makes you desire to work hard or you vanish. With an
average IQ, I can make it by working hard in a land of coconuts.
My
children have too many coconuts and they live in a more lavish life style than
the old man. They ask me why I work that hard during my retirement or why I
still go to Burger King with a coupon even they do not treat me like a king.
·
According
to my friend Norman, the problem with a small place filled with coconuts is
someone would likely to colonize you and steal your coconuts as happened to
Norway during WWII. Similar to China about 250 years ago. Once a while, need to
cut down one among many coconut trees to make spears to protect the rest of the
coconuts.
2 Our major problems
As
of 2015, we’re running out of tools to stimulate the market. The zero interest
rate has lost its effectiveness especially when most countries are using the
same tool. We cannot pass our debts to the next generations forever.
We need to cut down
expenses by:
·
Ending our participation in the wars in Middle
East.
·
Not turning the illegals into legal.
·
Reducing our generous welfare.
·
Encouraging able folks to work.
·
Encouraging constructions over consumptions.
Filler:
$80 sneakers
Amazingly, some kids from welfare families show off their $80 sneakers that I cannot afford (or not too stupid) to buy. It is same as going to see a doctor for a minor cold.
Tufts is giving scholarships to children of illegals. How many want to disguise as illegals (no proofs are needed to be illegal)?
No one saves. When you save too much (like myself), you lose all the goodies from the government such as free health care. With more than 40% not working, we're a nation of free loaders.
Actually the rich can afford to buy good stuffs more as the stock market is great. It widens the wealth gap and causes disputes. The problem is 1% cannot support the rest even if they spend like no tomorrow as the rest of our citizens are doing.
What's wrong with this country (compared to 50s and 60s)?
·
3 The evils of printing money
I just explained to my grandchild that money does not fall
from the sky or grow on trees. Every time we print money, it does the
following:
1. An
invisible tax is added to the rich as their purchasing power will be decreased
via inflation.
2. Your
children and grandchildren will pay for the loans.
3. Selling
a piece of our asset to foreigners.
4. Our
products are less globally competitive as we have to add more taxes to pay for
the loans. It is more competitive initially as our currency has been depreciated,
but this will not last long.
5. Give
more reasons for the rich to give up citizenship and move to another country. Most
become rich for being smart and opportunistic.
6. The
USD being a reserve currency is closer to end.
The only winners are the lobbyists and politicians, who bought
votes with the money from your pocket.
It will help the stock market in
the short-term, but it is very damaging for the long-term economy. That's also
the primary reason why the recovery of our economy is taking forever. Printing
money to the maximum is not a solution but a problem. Today most countries are
printing money excessively.
Afterthoughts
·
We have inflation (such as most products in the
super market) and deflation (such as housing expenses) since 2008.
·
As of 6/2012, we have 16 trillions of debt and
it is substantially less depending on whether you include the entitlements.
Besides the poor environment, unpromising economy, our children and
grandchildren inherit our huge debts. So far, it is about $55,000 debt for each
baby born today. However, many foreigners want their babies born here, so
everything is relative.
4 Low interest rate
As of 2013, we have the lowest
interest rates for a long while, which is normal in a recession. It is a great
time to buy a house (especially with the depressed house prices) and / or
borrow money. [Update 2016: The above has been correctly predicted.]
Low interest rates have many impacts on our investment:
·
Usually they're better for the stock market as
corporations can borrow at cheaper rates and hence improve the bottom line. In
theory but not today, it should be great for the housing market and retailers.
·
Corporations can borrow money at favorable rates
to buy back their own stocks or acquire other companies to boost their own
stock prices.
However,
prolonged period of low interest rate will damage the economy. Japan is one
example.
·
Folks including retirees, who depend on fix
incomes, will suffer.
·
Dividend stocks will prosper from investment on moving
bonds to stocks until interest rate starts moving up.
·
Eventually the current long-term bonds will
suffer big time when interest rate moves up as the higher-interest bonds are
more valuable.
The government has to lower the rate to stimulate business, but at the same time it cannot prolong the low rate too long.
Afterthoughts
·
As of 8/2012, the yield of 10-year Treasury Bill
is about 1.75%, the lowest in my recent memory.
It is better to keep cash now than CDs, so we do not miss any
opportunity to move back to equity.
·
Today, we’ve the lowest interest rate in memory
but we’re still in a recession; the Fed is running out of tools to improve the
economy.
5 Inflation and deflation
The historical annual average is
about 3% inflation. CPI
is not a good gauge any more after energy and food have been excluded.
Inflation is:
·
An invisible tax to the rich.
·
A strategy to lessen the loan burden. To
illustrate, your loan of $1 can buy a loaf of bread now, and you will pay back
the $1 plus negligible interest that can buy only half a loaf of bread due to
inflation.
·
An invisible salary cut.
·
An invisible cut to your entitlements/welfare.
Social security is supposed to be adjusted to CPI, which
can be manipulated by the government by not using food and energy to reduce
social security payment increases.
·
An invisible cut to your investment incomes
(dividends and appreciation).
Deflation is no angel:
Deflation is far worse than inflation to the economy. When the company produces a product and finds out they have to sell it for less due to deflation, then their profit would be cut and they might need to lay off employees.
Deflation is far worse than inflation to the economy. When the company produces a product and finds out they have to sell it for less due to deflation, then their profit would be cut and they might need to lay off employees.
Deflation would destroy all financial
institutions. It makes all their collaterals on all loans less valuable and the
borrowers may give up their collaterals as they’re worth less.
Inflation and deflation at the same time
As of 2014, we have both inflation and deflation at the
same time for several years now.
We have inflation in most of our basic necessities: food,
gasoline and heat (especially important for the NE) with the exception of rent
due to the depressed house prices. Electronic stuffs and PCs are deflated
considering how much we can buy today vs. last year. Cars have been slightly
deflated when figuring in the extra features.
Outlook
The government should ensure inflation and deflation are
within an acceptable range (3% to me). It has printed a lot of money and lower
interest rate to stimulate the economy. At the same time inflation has been
accelerated in many sectors. When the economy does not improve, the government
has run out of tools to improve our depressed economy.
However, beside time the shale energy may cure all problems.
When the economy improves, the inflation and the interest rate would most
likely increase. Oil price depends on supply and demand. The poor economy will
decrease the supply and hence the oil price would be depressed.
Afterthoughts
·
The dollar has lost more than 90% of its value since
the FED was created due to inflation. However, it only affects you if you save
your cash under the pillow. Our capitalism system punishes those who do not
invest and take risk. If you invest in long-term CDs, you’re doing barely OK.
If you buy any stock such as Edison’s new venture or a piece of real estate in
your town in 1913, most likely it beats inflation by a good margin and Uncle
Sam would be glad to share your fortune via capital gain taxes.
·
From my personal experiences.
The Big Mac
Value Meal cost about $1 in 1970 and now it costs $7, 7 times in 45 years.
An average
house in my hometown in 1980 cost $45,000, and now it costs $450,000, 10 times
in about 30 years.
Houses in most
cases are better deals. Besides paying the tax-deductible property tax and
interest, we can live in them.
The $10,000
under my pillow in 1980 has no gain today, but it gives me a headache every
time I sleep on it. J
·
Today a bag of 10.5
ounce Lays potato ships is $4.29, and the next day it was downsized it to 9.5
ounces. All items in the grocery store are just like that. The millionaires
have no complaint as their stocks (as of 6/2013) have been up since 2008.
·
For those who have jobs, you have a deflation
when your same income can buy you more of your basic supplies / services than
last year with the exception of food and gasoline as in 2013.
Most investments
are beating the inflation from last several years. The wealth gap has been
widened between the middle class and the rich.
Five years ago, the gas price is less than $2 and now it is over $3
[Update: $2 as of 1/2015]. We still have high unemployment and high
under-employment. Most recent college graduates cannot find jobs or jobs in
their choice. It happens all over the world.
·
Inflation is controlled by the government
via the rate of money being printed and / or easing credit. When we have more
money chasing the same quantity of products / services, we have to pay more for
them or we call it inflation. In shorter term, it may be distorted by other
events such as the deteriorating housing prices. With excessive printing, I see
hyperinflation in the coming years.
·
Inflation is rising.
Labor
We have to divide it into two
categories: labor that can't be outsourced and labor that can be.
Labor outsourced to China (your iPhone for example) and India is
still relatively cheap.
Labor in the US like flipping burgers, fixing your
plumbing problems, or your telephone services will be increased in cost. If
they are not, they will be manipulated by the government via welfare (we pay
for them via our taxes) or the unions. A worker at Burger King cannot survive
without government subsidy or family largesse.
Commodities
Commodities
All commodities including farm
land will increase in value due to:
a.
Supply and demand -
the net growth of population is rising but it is offset by the poor economy.
b.
Excessive printing of
money. You will be able to buy half a loaf of bread with the dollar that used
to buy you the full loaf.
·
My official definition of Fed in my joke book.
The Fed acts more like a mistress to the president
than an agency. The two are not officially related. But, they're on the same
bed most of the day.
I worked there. Unfortunately I did not climb the corporate ladder all the way otherwise we do not have this economic mess. Same reason why the Celtics lose as they did not recruit me J
I worked there. Unfortunately I did not climb the corporate ladder all the way otherwise we do not have this economic mess. Same reason why the Celtics lose as they did not recruit me J
Filler:
### Inflation meter
When
the beggar asked me for a spare dollar, I felt the inflation pinch. That's the
real inflation meter. Forget what the government tells you.
6 Education by example
A good economy has to be supported by an educated workforce.
We still have the best higher education system in both quantity and quality.
Our pre-college
education is failing with a high percent of dropouts.
When you find out your store under
charged you by $1, do you go back to pay them back?
I do not for two reasons:
I do not for two reasons:
1.
The store has cheated
me before intentionally or unintentionally, so it breaks even.
2.
We also need to teach our children to conserve energy. J
Despite the above reasons, I’ll go back to set up an example for my children. The primary problem with our education system is education should start at home. No matter how much money you throw into the system, it will not work if the students do not want to learn. With so many single-parent and teenage-mother families, I do not see a bright future.
It happens all the time that you have a convict and a doctor in the same class as indicated by this video. It proves my point again that education should start at home.
Some of our discrimination and biases are passed to our children unknowingly. That will hurt them eventually. Be careful what we talk / act in front of our children.
Education by example is the most powerful and most effective, but unfortunately it is the most neglected. It is about time for the politicians resolve our root problems NOT by throwing our money (not their money) recklessly at the problem. Everyone with a first grade education can write a check and we do not pay our leaders to write checks.
We need to limit the generous welfare
for teenage mothers and preach family value to stop the vicious cycle.
Afterthoughts
This short article attracted a
lot of feedbacks.
·
My elementary class in Hong Kong of 45 students
produced one world-known chef, one movie director, one MIT Ph.D., one
pharmacist, one doctor… I am the under achiever or the black sheep of my class.
Our teachers were not from Hong Kong University (the best there). The incentive
to learn is simple: If you do not study hard, you will be a nobody. No one will
bail you out. Our average class size is 45, so do not use class size as another
excuse.
·
We need to select college trainings in the
fields that the society or the corporations need. It is a luxury to take a major
you’re interested in but is not demanded by the society. I did not have that
luxury. However, even though I could not speak English well, I managed to start
a professional job as a programmer while some college graduates with perfect
English Xeroxed manuals for me.
·
The problem of many high school students is the
loss of respect to their teachers. You cannot learn from someone you do not
respect. I feel bad for the teachers in many urban cities as your lives could
be at risk every day and many lose their initial enthusiasm to teach after they
face their cruel reality.
My friend Norman added and it never happens in the
city I grew up:
My wife taught reform school in Richmond and was
threatened several times. Once the girls
in her food service class grabbed her and held a pair of scissors to her throat.
·
The U.S. college
education is a big export. It does not seem to be counted in our GDP and it
should be. In addition to the highly–qualified professors, we have the best
research (both on equipment, procedures and systems).
The landscape has been changed.
Though most professors are still born here for more than one generation, a lot
of students are foreigners and the children of the first generation of
immigrants. Our high school systems are not graduating qualified students in
the same scale as the last generation and foreign countries especially Asians
are catching up and some are even passing us.
·
Some Chinese students here
are tutored by their parents on science and mathematics every night and a lot
of students in China go to tutor schools after regular school. If we do not
have the dedication and support to our children, we cannot catch up with them.
·
'Leave no one
behind', 'Race to the top', 'No homework '... are just ideals and bear no
fruits in the real world except for the big-mouth politicians.
After our best effort to educate
the problem kids, should we still leave them to disturb the rest of the class?
China’s one-child policy gives
rise to better education of the next generation. The child is raised by two
parents and four grandparents. It is all good as long the child is not spoiled.
·
One guy who was among
the top in the unified examination for high schools in Hong Kong drove a bus to
make a statement. We need these geniuses to create more jobs such as
discovering a new drug to save many lives, not driving a bus.
·
One child plays video
game for two hours extra and one studies two hours extra every day. Do you
believe they will achieve the same in life provided the last names of them are
not Kennedy?
One Chinese high school has an
average class size of 70 and has equipment below our standard. The difference
is the students study at least three hours after dinner. It is in Tier III city
and it is just a typical school.
·
Why Mass. is rich? It
is due to the large number of high tech companies including those involved in
bio tech formed by former researchers of higher-learning institutions such as
MIT and Harvard. It proves my point that we need about .5% of geniuses to
provide jobs for the mass.
·
Robots will be
harmful to the employment of the unskilled workers. In next five years after
2015, we can see the more replacement by the robots.
Five years ago, robots could not
do much. Now, they can do something useful from vacuum cleaners to bionic limbs.
In ten years, they can do almost everything like a human being except one task
(i.e. reproduce but they can assemble robots).
Robots are still expensive for many
jobs today. To illustrate, Apple can assemble thousands of workers to
manufacture a new product in China. They cannot have that large number of
robots and program them in a short time.
·
Non-correlation of
education and the economy.
Brazil’s booming economy (due to high natural resources including
oil) can benefit more with better education and harder working citizens. The
education is lacking in Brazil. It gives rise to corruption and widens the
wealth gap.
Brazil is one of the major countries participating in today’s
globalization. When China slows down, Brazil will feel the pain too.
Philippines has the opposite problem. It has a lot of college
graduates working at factories. The economy does not support enough
professionals. The poor economy is due to lack of natural resources, long-term
corruption, poor governance, etc.
Hong Kongers hire nurses and teachers from Philippines to be
their household servants. It appears to be inequality, but actually it reduces
inequality by providing them the best jobs they can find.
Links
·
Stuffs
that college do not teach.
·
Click here
for more Afterthoughts.
# Filler:
### Tips
###
·
You need to know both value
investing and the basic technical analysis to be successful in today’s market.
·
Buy in fears and sell in greed
instead of the other way round.
·
An inflated sector will return to
the average value.
·
Be conservative and diversified.
The turtles are always the winners in the long run.
7 A prolonged recession
As of 2014, we're
in the 6th year of this recession even the market recovers fully. It is the
longest from my memory. We tried too many short-term solutions such as massively
printing money and rescuing big companies that should have failed. They work
for the short term especially for the stock market, but it does not work in the
long term. The temporary fixes are definitely not beneficial for the economy
and its capitalist system. Politicians want to buy votes and voters do not want
to bite the bullet. In addition, our economy is globally connected. What
happens in foreign countries including EU and China will affects us.
Sometimes no solution is the best solution and let nature take care of itself. No companies are too big to fall. We cannot spend recklessly to solve our problems and that is the main reason to get us into this recession on the first place.
Sometimes no solution is the best solution and let nature take care of itself. No companies are too big to fall. We cannot spend recklessly to solve our problems and that is the main reason to get us into this recession on the first place.
When
we let big banks or corporations fail, the job unemployment would rise and
their buildings will be empty. It is a temporary problem. Companies with better
management will take over, start hiring and fill the buildings. It is called
capitalism and it lets the fittest to survive. The lessons will be learned.
Our
money has been used unproductively on unemployment and welfare. I’m glad we did
not bail out Lehman Brothers as their former clients all over the world would
ask them to pay back for misinterpreting the safety of their derivatives with
some of them bundled as ‘mini bonds’. Many of the banks selling these
derivatives are liable since Lehman Brothers is gone.
The
investors are doing fine in the market as it is close to the 2007 level today.
It is still a depression when you lose your job and/or your house.
I'm looking and longing for a prolonged bull market when the two wars will finally and completely end. The U.S. is still full of natural resources especially per capita wise. Everyone who wants to work should have a job. The environmentalists should allow the oil companies to drill unless the concerns are real. The politicians should have a longer vision beyond four years and we cannot pass our debts to the next generations forever.
Afterthoughts
·
From Eric: I think you are completely on the
spot on with this point. The system needs to cleanse itself once and for all,
and current policies are only prolonging the agony at this point. I was OK with
QE1, as a chaotic unraveling could not have been allowed, but I still wonder if
we wouldn't be much further along in putting the crisis behind us if QE2 was
left on the shelf back in 2010. Sure the adjustment process is painful, but so
are many things in life that must inevitably be endured before things can get
better.
·
From Wheels: Recession for 4
years...hmmm...sounds like a depression to me...And we all know the reason why
nature will never be allowed to take care of itself: because it's not
politically tenable. No politician can stand up and speak to the dumb masses
that we’re in trouble.
On the investing front, can someone please tell me how it is possible to get real valuations for the market with all the juice that global central banks have put in? Trying to invest with "fundamentals" in mind is making my brain hurt, because there is no such thing as fundamentals with all this intervention. And, 2008 is still staring us in the face, and scares me. And I think I'm a pretty average Joe investor out there.
On the investing front, can someone please tell me how it is possible to get real valuations for the market with all the juice that global central banks have put in? Trying to invest with "fundamentals" in mind is making my brain hurt, because there is no such thing as fundamentals with all this intervention. And, 2008 is still staring us in the face, and scares me. And I think I'm a pretty average Joe investor out there.
# Filler:
### Politics. It is very seldom we have the
third term won by the same political party; based on this I predict Republican
will win. Republican is pro-business but statistically the market does not fare
well under the Republican leadership. Will it be true this time? Only time can
tell. ###
·
8 W-shaped recession?
As of 2013, this
recovery is different from the previous ones:
1.
For most job seekers, it is still a recession.
If you lose a job, it is a depression. No matter how the government dresses up
the employment picture for election, employment is still not promising.
As of 2014,
we have improving employment. However, the median wage is still lacking. If you
get a job that pays half your previous job, you will not spend recklessly like
our government.
Many quit
looking for jobs. The sign-up bonus for recent graduates is replaced by years
of under-employment in jobs that they do not have to go to college for.
Globalization
changes the entire picture from your daddy’s days. Corporations can hire the
best candidate (slave wages and good education with the right skills) any place
in the world.
2.
Corporate profits are good after the bare bone
cuts. They need to spend more and hire more to ensure future earnings.
Employment is still low today.
They can move
their ‘headquarters’ to any place in the world to seek the best tax benefits.
We’re forcing the golden geese to fly away. It is similar to taxing the rich
excessively.
3.
Large money supply drives down the interest
rate. It should be good for business for several years to come. However, the money
supply does not stimulate business investment and hiring as it is supposed to.
The government is running out of tools to stimulate the economy.
4.
We've inflation for most commodities and food
but deflation for housing.
I do not want to ignore the slim chance of a W-shaped recession even the market is doing great lately. A W-shaped recession means two recessions one after the other without recovery in a short time. It is very rare but we have the perfect storm coming our way with the EU crisis and China’s slow down.
Very often time
cures all our problems including the EU crisis, our reckless spending… This
time it just takes longer than usual.
As
of 1/2013, the chance of a W-shaped recession is very slim, but the economy is
recovering very slowly. We have a non-correlation between the stock market and
the economy. However, it will return to the normal correlation.
II The stock market
9 When will DOW double?
Dow will double (to 25,000) before the end
of this decade (2020) if most of the following materialize. My prediction is
more realistic than the book Dow 40,000.
·
The two wars will finally end by then and the
U.S. will not start another one. We cannot afford to be the world’s policeman
fighting for our idealism. Let others fight for their own freedom, their own
humanity and their own ideology. Being a big brother means nothing when we have
15% unemployment / under employment. Does Vietnam today threaten the world?
·
Again avoid any physical war at all cost.
Japan and several Asian countries are
dragging us to a war with China on the disputes of oil resources in some islets
in China Sea. Throughout history, Japan has been a fierce aggressor to its
neighbors and its navy is growing fast. Why should we protect Japan militarily
with our money while Japan passes us in living standard? When Japan and S.
Korea fight, which should we side? Learn from our lessons from Middle East
wars.
·
Be friendly with China.
Avoid any trade war which has the risk of
them pulling out their debts of over a trillion dollar. If it happens, it would
damage our economy.
·
Buy more printers to print money.
It
would lead to super high inflation (so $20,000 today could only buy $10,000
goods in 2020). In this case, Dow doubles but not in real purchasing power
except for the tax collectors. It will harm the economy long term. It would
damage the banks that lend with today’s money and will get back the money with
less purchasing power.
·
Cut down entitlements.
In addition, force those able, long-term
welfare recipients to work on jobs taken by illegal aliens now. Clinton’s work
bill does not work in many states with too many misinterpretations.
·
No more bailout.
No one including the state government is too big to fail. Cut the government size to half. It will not be degrade the service as most government workers have tiny workloads. I hope we’ll not bail out Detroit. If we do, we will have to bail out other cities such as Chicago and many cities in California. It is easy to ask for money than to work for money. Laziness is a human nature.
No one including the state government is too big to fail. Cut the government size to half. It will not be degrade the service as most government workers have tiny workloads. I hope we’ll not bail out Detroit. If we do, we will have to bail out other cities such as Chicago and many cities in California. It is easy to ask for money than to work for money. Laziness is a human nature.
·
Help small businesses.
Give incentives to businesses to invest here
such as low tax rates, less complicated regulations / laws, low legal claims,
etc. We cannot compete if our wages, taxes and regulations to do business here
are too high or too restrictive. We need to bring our living standard to how
much we earn, and not to how much we can borrow.
·
Incentives to big corporations.
No more corporate welfare. At least tax the
profits made in the U.S. Give them incentives to hire here.
·
Reward folks taking risk by lowering taxes on
investment incomes. Taxing the rich excessively will drive them to leave the
U.S. We seldom have high taxes and business growth at the same time.
·
With the shale oil and gas, the U.S. could be
energy independent if there is minimal damage to our environment.
·
Reform our election system. The primary
objective of a president should not be reelection but serving us.
·
Emphasize on the economy.
Is
being #1 more than employment? Is consumption (via borrowing) more important
than production (improving our deteriorating infrastructure)?
We need a law to balance the budget to be
implemented after this recession. Most
of the above will not materialize as the politicians cannot buy votes with many
measures and no voter wants to bite the bullet. It seems we’re heading to more
government spending and loans. Dow will double only due to higher inflation.
History or not yet?
10 Politics and the stock market
Republicans
are usually pro-business, but the democratic presidency has better track record
for better market performance.
The Dow index was up 56% (from 7,949 to 12,418) in the less than 3 years since the day when Obama took office. As of 8/2012, it is 13,100, so the market has been fully recovered from 2007-2008, but not the economy. If you still collect unemployment or your house has been foreclosed, you're still in deep trouble.
The S&P500 performance under Republicans vs. Democrats since 1926:
The Dow index was up 56% (from 7,949 to 12,418) in the less than 3 years since the day when Obama took office. As of 8/2012, it is 13,100, so the market has been fully recovered from 2007-2008, but not the economy. If you still collect unemployment or your house has been foreclosed, you're still in deep trouble.
The S&P500 performance under Republicans vs. Democrats since 1926:
Annualized return under Democratic presidencies: 13.74%
Annualized return under Republican presidencies: 6.25%
The President's appointees for the economy are the ones to watch as they set up the policies. As of 2012, the interest rate is not a factor as it cannot go much lower. The cut in military expenses and the ending of the two wars will be good for the economy.
The problem of the two major political parties is that they do not agree with each other, so they have to make too many compromises and waste a lot of time and effort.
Afterthoughts
·
Since we have more people depend on the welfare
/ entitlements and the government jobs, they will vote accordingly and that
will not cut down deficits in the foreseeable future especially the baby
boomers are starting to collect the entitlements.
·
Do not blame the news
media. They broadcast what you want to hear.
Do not blame the politicians. They do what you want them to do.
Do not blame the politicians. They do what you want them to do.
Do not blame me. I deliver what you want to get.
So blame you yourself.
·
However, 40% (45% soon
in our deteriorating economy) do not pay Federal income taxes and they take
back more via welfare benefits and entitlements from the society.
The rich (1%) can blame the poor (40%), and the poor can blame the rich for the ‘welfare’ for the rich. They are both right and both wrong.
If we divide the society into 3 groups: the rich, the middle class and the poor, the middle class (I and most of you belong to this 59%) is really squeezed by both sides
The rich (1%) can blame the poor (40%), and the poor can blame the rich for the ‘welfare’ for the rich. They are both right and both wrong.
If we divide the society into 3 groups: the rich, the middle class and the poor, the middle class (I and most of you belong to this 59%) is really squeezed by both sides
·
Capitalism encourages
folks to work hard, communism encourages folks to be lazy, and socialism
encourages folks to steal.
·
It is obvious that
the 2012 was partly won by the Hispanic votes with the promise of legalizing
the illegal aliens. We’re the only country on earth that welcomes illegals.
Have our politicians calculated the costs for welfare benefits and the impact
on jobs if we legalize the illegals?
·
A good president does not have to be an expert
in every field except being a good communicator. He should delegate his power
and know whom he hires for a specific job. Unfortunately his personal objective
is to get re-elected during his first term. In the second term if reelected,
build his legacy to sell his books/speeches and reserve a space in history.
Actually he has about 18 months to do so in the second term.
From my definition, Obama is not a great
president. Reagan had good acting skills. Bush was not. Carter was too
gentlemanly and not firm. Nixon was tougher but his hand was caught in the
cookie jar. Clinton invented or gave new meanings to some terms in our
dictionary (such as interns, inhale, sex…) and got away. Basically I cannot
find too many great presidents in recent history. We may have to blame our
election system. If I want to be one of them, I would choose Clinton for all
the funs he is having. J
·
Whenever I make any political remark or any
remark against the government, I have a chance of offending half of the
population if we are evenly distributed into the two political parties. A good
discussion even against any politician is better than no discussion. We are not
a member in Bush’s cabinet who has to agree everything with the chief in order
to survive.
11 Distorting indexes
The
S&P 500
and Dow may not be a good benchmark especially for long term (say 15
years) for the following reasons. It would give you distorted results if it is
not used correctly. The better ones are the equivalent ETFs like SPY, but they
have a shorter history. Wilshire 5000
is less popular but it represents the market better.
1
Survivorship bias.
To illustrate, excluding Lehman
Brothers, AIG… the indexes would have better return than they actually are,
especially for dividend stock performance in 2008. How many dividends you have
to gain when you lose the entire investment on these stocks? If you do not
include the many failed small companies, your portfolio on this group should be
fantastic.
2
Most companies in the 1920s have not survived.
They may be spun off, being acquired, or the name being changed. Examples
abound. Comparing the index of a specific year is fine but not from 1920 to
today.
One testing technique is having
a test window for a shorter time frame; for example, start on the first of the
year and end at the end of the same year. Repeat the test every year for the test
period and average the results.
To illustrate, a company originally worth $2M spins off a subsidy and each new company now values at $1M. It does not mean the original company loses half of the value and the data base should adjust the price accordingly. Usually spun-off companies appreciate more than the market, but there are many exceptions such as Palm.
To illustrate, a company originally worth $2M spins off a subsidy and each new company now values at $1M. It does not mean the original company loses half of the value and the data base should adjust the price accordingly. Usually spun-off companies appreciate more than the market, but there are many exceptions such as Palm.
3
When I use a database with no survivorship adjustments,
I usually have strategies making incredible returns especially those strategies
including penny stocks.
To illustrate, I have two stocks costing one cent each in the same portfolio. One goes to 2 cents and hence makes 100% return and the other one goes to 0. In reality, my return for this portfolio is 0. However, the database does not include the bankrupted stock and hence it shows me I have a 100% gain in this portfolio.
When you see the ads claiming unbelievable returns, it could be the survival bias or they use the best price of the day to their advantages.
To illustrate, I have two stocks costing one cent each in the same portfolio. One goes to 2 cents and hence makes 100% return and the other one goes to 0. In reality, my return for this portfolio is 0. However, the database does not include the bankrupted stock and hence it shows me I have a 100% gain in this portfolio.
When you see the ads claiming unbelievable returns, it could be the survival bias or they use the best price of the day to their advantages.
4
Stocks are added and removed from the indexes
every year. The ones that are removed could be bankrupted or doing badly like
Kodak, Polaroid, AIG, Bear Stern, etc. It would make the indexes look better
than they really are as they are replaced by better companies.
5
Inflation. When I was in college, I paid $1 for
a Value Meal and now I need to pay $7 for the same meal. My stock has to appreciate
six times to break even, not to mention the taxes for the Federal government
and the state.
6
Dividends are not added to the index.
When your
investment says they have 10% return and compare it to the index with 8%
without dividends, the comparison is wrong. The investment is even with the
index if the dividend is 2%. By law, the investment subscriptions / services
can take advantage of this. Check the current rule.
7
Both indexes are not ideal and both do not
represent the complete market. S&P500 with capital-weighted construction is
better than Dow with price-weighted construction.
Usually Dow and
S&P500 follow each other, but not in 2012. In 2012, the largest ten
contributors in S&P rise but not in Dow.
I prefer to use S&P 500 (^SP500 in Yahoo!Finance or ^SP 500TR including dividends) which has a decent historical data and it has better diversity than the Dow:
Annual
Total Return as of 2016
|
2015
|
2014
|
2013
|
2012
|
2011
|
S&P 500
|
1.4%
|
13.7%
|
32.4%
|
16.0%
|
2.1%
|
S&P 400
|
2.2%
|
9.8%
|
33.5%
|
17.9%
|
-1.7%
|
S&P 600
|
2.0%
|
5.8%
|
41.3%
|
16.3%
|
1.0%
|
Explanation
·
They are total returns (= appreciation +
dividends).
·
S&P 500 represents large stocks, 400
represents mid-cap stocks and 600 small stocks according to S&P’s
definitions.
·
The following illustrates how to estimate
S&P 500 index by using SPY and prices from Yahoo!Finance.
Return= -.76%
appreciation + 1.78% dividend + .1% for expenses for the ETF = 1.12%.
Dividend
yield changes during the year, so it is just an educated estimate. The result
is a little difference from the one published but it is acceptable.
·
2013 is a great year for all caps especially
small cap while 2014 is for large cap.
Links
S&P 500:
Dow:
12 Momentum and volatility
Take
advantage of the fluctuations and the short-term trends of the market. Volatility and Momentum work opposite to each other. Select the fluctuation
(volatility) or short-term trend (momentum) according to the current market
conditions.
When
we've so many 3% fluctuations and the S&P stays flat, you can take
advantage of fluctuations by buying a market ETF at the dips (3% down in this
example) and selling at the temporary surges (3% up in this example). 2015 is a
market good for this side market.
Bollinger Bands
supposedly indicates stocks normally trading within the bands (upper and
lower). This technical indicator is available in most charts such as
Yahoo!Finance. For example, enter SPY for the stock and select the Bollinger
Bands. You should see the two bands and the stock price in between. Buy when
its price is closer to the lower band and sell when it is closer to the higher
band.
Momentum is profitable by buying when the last n days is up by x% (you define your n and x and adjust it according to the past data for the stock). You need to protect your portfolio with stops as momentum can reverse. Do the opposite (via a contra ETF) when momentum goes in the opposite direction.
Design tests using historical data from Yahoo!Finance and implement your strategy accordingly. It can also be used to test the direction of the current market. A lot of time volatility happens for a very long period before the market changes direction.
Momentum works better in a rising market especially not using contra ETFs. Monitor whether the market peak is close, as it could plunge very fast and very steep. In this case use stop orders to limit big losses due to market plunge.
Momentum is profitable by buying when the last n days is up by x% (you define your n and x and adjust it according to the past data for the stock). You need to protect your portfolio with stops as momentum can reverse. Do the opposite (via a contra ETF) when momentum goes in the opposite direction.
Design tests using historical data from Yahoo!Finance and implement your strategy accordingly. It can also be used to test the direction of the current market. A lot of time volatility happens for a very long period before the market changes direction.
Momentum works better in a rising market especially not using contra ETFs. Monitor whether the market peak is close, as it could plunge very fast and very steep. In this case use stop orders to limit big losses due to market plunge.
Links
Volatility:
Momentum:
13 Investors’ psychology 101
Emotions
control our investment decisions. We buy in greed and / or excessive optimism
and sell in fears and / or excessive pessimism. They are just human natures
that we have to avoid. Here are some pointers.
·
Emotionally detached.
Investing is about making money at the least risk with emotions detached. Never fall in love in a stock or a group of stocks. Never be bothered by failed stocks and do not be too excited with successful trades.
Investing is about making money at the least risk with emotions detached. Never fall in love in a stock or a group of stocks. Never be bothered by failed stocks and do not be too excited with successful trades.
·
Every asset/class will return to the average
value with one or two minor exceptions (gold is one but most likely it is due
to the depreciation of USD). As previously stated, when a strategy is used by
everyone, it will lose its performance.
·
Do not risk the money you cannot afford to lose.
One recent retiree lost most of his money in a market downturn and he died due to too much worry. After a year, the market recovered and he should have recovered all his losses except his life.
One recent retiree lost most of his money in a market downturn and he died due to too much worry. After a year, the market recovered and he should have recovered all his losses except his life.
Older
investors should have a rainy day fund in cash.
This could be 10-30% of your total portfolio depending on its size.
Younger families should have enough emergency income for at least 6 months.
·
Buy when the market is bleeding and sell when
everyone is buying. Buy low and sell high is the best strategy but it is hard to do
so as our emotions do not allow us to do so.
·
Diversifying your portfolio will improve
your mental health besides your investment performance. Stocks could plunge
with unexpected events and / or being manipulated. Diamond and Carnival were
examples in 2012. I can sleep better with one bad loss among 20, but not one
among 2.
·
Do not buy sin stocks like tobacco companies
unless the potential profit is more important than your moral can allow. One
option is to donate the ‘loot’ to the cause such as Lung Cancer for this
example.
·
Do not follow the herd without an exit strategy. If you are against the herd
(contrarian), make sure you have good reasons to do so.
The flow to money fund proves that the average retail investor is usually wrong in market timing.
The flow to money fund proves that the average retail investor is usually wrong in market timing.
### Tips from my book Best Stocks 2014 ###
From 12/16/13 (publish date) to
3/29/14 (today), the performances of the entire list of 9 small micro-cap
stocks (RAS is not a micro-cap by my definition) are:
Stock
|
Market
Cap (M)1
|
Annualized
Return
|
ARTX
|
52
|
234%
|
CPSS
|
176
|
6%
|
RAS
|
602
|
-19%
|
GST
|
329
|
83%
|
EVC
|
515
|
65%
|
LEE
|
171
|
293%
|
SGU
|
313
|
16%
|
HILL
|
166
|
491%
|
MNTG
|
147
|
12%
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
131%
|
SPY
|
|
22%
|
Beat SPY by
|
|
496%
|
|
|
|
1 As of 12/16/13
14 Herd theory
When the herd makes
money, they think they're genius. The last one to leave the herd will be the
fool of all fools such as the last holders of Lehman Brothers, AIG, Bear
Sterns, etc. The biggest fools are the ‘value’ buyers when these companies were
plunging fast. When a specific stock looked great yesterday and it lost 50%
today, it must be super good. Wrong! Check why it plunges. It could be missing
some important metric or something is really wrong with the company that did
not show up in the research.
The real genius is
the one who makes money on the way up but leaves before the bubble bursts. Even
a genius cannot predict the peak and the bottom but I'll call him/her a genius
if s/he is right better than 60% of the time.
Now dividend growth stocks have the highest premium in the last 30 years. It is a mild bubble when we've many retired or retiring folks seeking for income. However, the bubble will burst when the interest rate rises. At that time, the long-term bonds with low yields will lose.
Now dividend growth stocks have the highest premium in the last 30 years. It is a mild bubble when we've many retired or retiring folks seeking for income. However, the bubble will burst when the interest rate rises. At that time, the long-term bonds with low yields will lose.
Dividend stocks
will benefit when the interest rate is low.
Bond holders move to dividend stocks from their low-yield bonds.
Long-term bonds lose their values when the interest rate rises, and vice versa.
Same for the internet bubble in 2000. I did unload most of my tech funds on early April, 2000. The more I read that time, the more I got scared. It was partly luck and partly ‘genius’ to move all these sector funds to traditional industries. At that time, they did not have contra ETFs, so cash, money market fund and bonds could be the best choices.
Same for the internet bubble in 2000. I did unload most of my tech funds on early April, 2000. The more I read that time, the more I got scared. It was partly luck and partly ‘genius’ to move all these sector funds to traditional industries. At that time, they did not have contra ETFs, so cash, money market fund and bonds could be the best choices.
15 Why market rises or falls
It
is a billion dollar question. The institution investors drive the market. Their
trades are more than 70% of the total trades. They switch to bond /cash when
the market is risky, switch to rising sectors and stocks with more profit
potential.
Market direction
There
are two cycles: the longer secular cycle and the shorter market cycle (do not
confuse with business cycle a.k.a. the economic cycle). The shorter market
cycle exists within the secular cycle.
For
simplicity and illustration, the duration of a secular cycle is 20 years and
the 4 years for market cycle.
Some
may argue we’re in the 9th year of the secular bull market cycle as
of 2016. However, the economy is still down. It is partly due to the major wars
that are draining our resources that should be devoted to the economy.
I
define the market cycle into the following phases: Peak, Bottom, Early Recovery
and Up. I recommend buying selected sectors in each phase.
Sectors and countries
Very
seldom sectors and countries continue its upward swing for years. They follow
their own sectors with the above phases too. With the growing and aging
population, some sectors such as health care should be in the secular bull
market.
Today’s market
As
of 2014, there are many positive signs and negative signs. I would predict we
will have a fierce correction for the market to take a breather. We cannot
print money (affecting interest rate, inflation, credit, margin accounts) at
the current pace. We should not pass our liabilities to the next generation
forever. When the printing is eased, we will have a correction. Hopefully the
economy will be strong enough to prevent a market plunge.
16 Earnings nightmare
A
bad earning would cause a stock to nose dive. As of 9/26/2014, FINL is such an
example. It lost 14% in one day to $25.11. I looked at all the fundamentals,
ratings from many sources and analyst recommendation before today. They are
really great. It is not a small company that would swing widely.
Here are some of
the metrics on the day. It belongs to the Specialty Retail sector which is not
great during a recession.
Metric
|
Value
|
Forward P/E
|
12
|
Debt /Equity
|
0
|
ROE
|
16%
|
Market Cap
|
1.2 B
|
Insider Trans
|
-16%
|
Short float
|
6%
|
EV/EBIT
|
8
|
Shiller P/E
|
21
|
Analyst Rating
|
9/10
|
F-Score
|
8
|
Revenue Growth
|
15
|
EBITA Growth
|
8
|
Zacks
|
Hold
|
PEY
|
6%
|
PScore
|
4
|
Score – ST
|
6
|
Score – LT
|
21
|
Explanation:
·
PEY – Pow’s Earning Yield considering cash and
debt. The passing grade is 4%.
·
PScore – My scoring system and 2 is the passing
grade. The higher, the better.
·
Score – Short Term. Based on PScore plus metrics
from my subscriptions. LT for long term. Passing grade is 15 for both.
The
only metric that shows problem is Insider Trans. Next time, before we buy a
stock, take a look at this ratio. If it is negative and more than 10%, watch
out. Insiders know the earnings before the announcement. As long as they follow
the rules, it is legal. The other warning is the institution ownership changing
from 100% to 6% in 3/31/14.
The
above figures are from Finviz.com, Fidelity (customer required) GuruFocus.com
and Zacks (subscription required for both). Usually Zacks is quite good for
predicting stocks before their earnings.
I may consider
buying it after this plunge. It could be a trap or an opportunity to make good
money.
It went further
down to almost $24 and as of 11/20/2014, it is back up to $27.74 shortly.
Missing
or exceeding earnings estimate would cause the stock to swing 10% either way.
For
long-term investments (over a year), ignore the announcement as long as the
fundamentals have not changed. The price swing is usually short term. Missing
or exceeding the consensus by one penny has no meaning to me. However,
calculate the fundamentals based on the new information such as the earnings.
III The USA
A Nation of No Losers
We do not let you
be a loser!
Your mistakes will be rewarded handsomely.
*
When you bought a mansion that you cannot afford, we bail you out.
Your mistakes will be rewarded handsomely.
*
When you bought a mansion that you cannot afford, we bail you out.
When your
beach-front house was destroyed by hurricane, we give you money to build one
(and the next one too).
When you bought a clunker that you should not have, we give you $4,500.
When you bought any inefficient appliance, we pay you no matter how old they are.
When you returned an old gun, we give you money for a better, updated gun so you can kill more.
When you lost your job, we extended your benefits.
When you cannot pay your college loan, we will give you amnesty.
When you ran out of money for Christmas gifts, we gave you 2% payroll tax reduction.
When you do not have saving or a real job, we give you free health care.
When you have saving or a real job (or becoming a winner), we take your free health care away.
When you die penniless, we help you out.
When you die with millions, we share your wealth.
*
When you bought a clunker that you should not have, we give you $4,500.
When you bought any inefficient appliance, we pay you no matter how old they are.
When you returned an old gun, we give you money for a better, updated gun so you can kill more.
When you lost your job, we extended your benefits.
When you cannot pay your college loan, we will give you amnesty.
When you ran out of money for Christmas gifts, we gave you 2% payroll tax reduction.
When you do not have saving or a real job, we give you free health care.
When you have saving or a real job (or becoming a winner), we take your free health care away.
When you die penniless, we help you out.
When you die with millions, we share your wealth.
*
Drunk drivers, no
one will prosecute you as the entire jury and even the judge are drunk.
Druggies, as long
as you do not inhale, you’re still a no-loser – we even elect you for our top
job.
We also make some
drugs legal to avoid your prosecution and also boost our tax incomes without
checking how many more deformed babies.
Murderers, as long
as you are rich, you will be free.
Baby killers, we
give you a movie / book deal to give you incentive to kill your next baby.
Prisoners, we will
set you free so we can fix our budget problem.
Rapists, you’re in good company of our politicians, coaches and clergymen who rape and cheat as a glorious sport.
Altar boys, you
could be the top 1%. Some want to know which churches you went to, so they will
be in the top 1%.
Minority kids, we
give you special pass to go to college and jobs.
Teenagers, the more
babies you have, the more benefits you have. Keep them coming.
Grade F students,
it is your teachers’ fault to give you too much homework. No one should be left
out except the smart ones.
We can demolish the
grade system, so we have no more F students. Simple fix!
Old folks, your driver
license is also a license to kill.
Fatsos do not worry. Our up-coming drugs will melt all your fat while you eat.
At the meantime, we double all seat sizes in buses, airplanes..., triple the size of the value meals and replace the slim actors with fatsos to make you look like a no-loser.
*
Congressmen, insider trading was legal to your privileged club. Sorry to close this loophole but you can keep the loots publicly.
Lobbyists, help us to put tariffs on Chinese products that we cannot compete with.
Congressmen, insider trading was legal to your privileged club. Sorry to close this loophole but you can keep the loots publicly.
Lobbyists, help us to put tariffs on Chinese products that we cannot compete with.
Prisoners, you will get the flu shots first and free dental care. If your local jails are full, we beg you to leave with free transportation and goodies.
Gun control, what’s
that? Just do not go to school or see a movie.
When you cheated
billion, you can retire in a resort-like 'prison'.
Also, the billions your wife hid are hers - no questions asked.
When your company fails, we bail it out.
The executives are rewarded with bailout money for bringing down a company.
When your company is failing, we give you half a billion instantly without checking – what a country!!!
*
All athletes are rewarded with millions for taking drugs.
We’re outrageous on foreign athletes doing the same.
It is an American invention and how dare the foreigners copy it without paying us royalty!
Also, the billions your wife hid are hers - no questions asked.
When your company fails, we bail it out.
The executives are rewarded with bailout money for bringing down a company.
When your company is failing, we give you half a billion instantly without checking – what a country!!!
*
All athletes are rewarded with millions for taking drugs.
We’re outrageous on foreign athletes doing the same.
It is an American invention and how dare the foreigners copy it without paying us royalty!
*
We have to lay off
our scientists due to lack of funds.
But we have funds
to bomb Syria.
Borrow money from
China to contain China. Smart idea!
We sell jets to
both Korea and Japan.
A friend of a no
loser is a no loser.
An enemy of a no
loser is a no loser too.
*
The small catch.
We need your vote to re-elect us every four years.
We win the election
by letting illegals (future voters) in to share our great welfare so they do
not have to work any more.
We give generous
welfare to the poor, the elderly losers, the mismanaged companies… in order to
buy votes.
The children cannot
vote today, so let's pass our debts to them.
China does not have a voice here, so let's pass all the blame to them.
Even the entire world agrees with us.
Our President was awarded the Nobel Prize for doing nothing but reckless spending, so why do you work hard and save?
China does not have a voice here, so let's pass all the blame to them.
Even the entire world agrees with us.
Our President was awarded the Nobel Prize for doing nothing but reckless spending, so why do you work hard and save?
The
above serves as a wakeup call / satire / joke and nothing more. It is written
by a 'winner' who actually is a ‘loser’.
Afterthoughts
·
This blog receives a lot of good responses but a
few personal attacks like ‘why don’t you go back to China’. If we do not know
our problems, we cannot fix them. Again, all the problems are minor and can be
easily fixed. I hope I’ll re-write the
above and this time in past tense.
·
I have enough material to write a similar
article on China. However, Chinese government is less open than the U.S.
·
Trump must have read this article: Tell the
truth and be honest. He will be our next president if he is less Trump and the other
politicians can beat him if they behave less like a politician. We must be tired of the lies from the
politicians. Should we have a law to ensure the elected keep most of their
promises? If of 2016, the Middle East wars have not been ended as promised.
·
Martin whom I do not know said: Thanks for this
one! I had fun reading this. I would be glad to share this to others!! This is
a blog that should be read over and over again!!
·
From Hzzz: it is impressive to summarize all our
ills. Now I know how screwed up we’re.
Picture Filler:
Hope tomorrow is brighter
17 The worthless job plan
Most government’s job plans have the basic problem: Spend,
spend and spend without worrying about where the money comes from. It does
create some jobs but at a huge expense. The problems are:
·
Pass our loan burden to our children and
grandchildren.
·
Will have high inflation (not now due to the
deflated prices of houses). However, judging from the price of gold and most
items in the super market in 2015, we already have inflation. Inflation is an
invisible tax to the rich.
·
Will raise our debt ceiling and hence it will
harm the economy in the long run.
·
Do not spend wisely.
To illustrate, education starts at home, not at school. With high drop out of poor students (unfortunately more from minorities today) who will be the majority, we do not have a future. Instead, we should limit the number of single parent families. This is one example among many.
To illustrate, education starts at home, not at school. With high drop out of poor students (unfortunately more from minorities today) who will be the majority, we do not have a future. Instead, we should limit the number of single parent families. This is one example among many.
·
Creating more government jobs is not a good way
to boost employment. We should calculate the actual cost of each job created.
We can learn from Greece before it is too late. Now Greece has to cut half of
the government employees and half of their salaries when the country is heading
to bankruptcy.
·
The most you can save is ending the current two
wars.
Check out how many billions of dollars we can save a
month without the two wars. We really need to fix our economy and unemployment
first. We cannot afford the two wars and any future war. Even with the
mightiest army on earth, we're really a paper tiger if we cannot fix our
internal problems such as employment. It is similar when Mao told his starving
citizens that they're #1 on earth; they could cover the eyes and minds with
dumb nationalism but not the growling stomach.
We have given too much to foreign countries. Helping the
desperate poor is fine, but not buying influence in foreign lands to corrupt
officials.
·
All of us ought to bite the bullet by increasing
taxes across the board and decreasing welfare / entitlements. They are not
popular to voters, but they will be the most simple and effective solution to a
complicated problem. However, we need to implement them gradually so it will
not prolong the recession.
Obama is a good communicator but
he should have acted far earlier to solve our economy problem that was created
by the previous president. It is obvious that Obama is buying votes for the
2012 election to satisfy everyone. It could be the same for any president. They
all play with the rules of the game. We need to change the rules and make their
objectives for longer term.
We elect our leaders, so we have to be blamed too. The major flaw in our political system is the election every four years. Our leaders plan for four years and not for the longer term. We've more poor citizens than the rich citizens, but each has one vote. After they've been elected, they have to pay back to the special interest groups who have funded their campaigns. That's why our democratic system could lead to corruption, American style.
Politicians have to watch out for the benefits / welfare of the poor in order to buy votes. The rich will migrate to other countries with fewer taxes. So are the corporations moving jobs, investments and the headquarters to foreign countries where business environments are more favorable with less taxes.
We elect our leaders, so we have to be blamed too. The major flaw in our political system is the election every four years. Our leaders plan for four years and not for the longer term. We've more poor citizens than the rich citizens, but each has one vote. After they've been elected, they have to pay back to the special interest groups who have funded their campaigns. That's why our democratic system could lead to corruption, American style.
Politicians have to watch out for the benefits / welfare of the poor in order to buy votes. The rich will migrate to other countries with fewer taxes. So are the corporations moving jobs, investments and the headquarters to foreign countries where business environments are more favorable with less taxes.
Afterthoughts
·
Unemployment should be a temporary safety net.
When the unemployment benefits are extended, the incentive to look for jobs is
also decreased. Many have given up
looking for jobs after trying their best. The better yardsticks are comparing
the following two with values of previous month: 1. Participation rate and 2.
Median salary. 3. The changes of the above two.
·
Why should you work if it means you would lose
all the generous benefits such as the free health care, food stamps, housing
subsidies…?
·
We really have more than the official 8%
unemployment if we count how many of our own friends/relatives are still
employed or under employed. 5% is the employment rate for the U.S. for ‘full
employment’.
·
Many are under-employed and they’re not counted
as unemployed; as of 3/2015 we have the lowest participation rate. To
illustrate, an ex-manager flips hamburgers at McDonald’s making a fraction of
his previous salary. The yardstick now is the improvement of median income.
·
As of 5/2013, ObamaCare will decrease jobs in
small businesses. The owners do not want to hire full-time employees as they do
not know how ObamaCare will impact their businesses. Most likely it will
require them to conform to the new laws that require businesses that hire over
a specified number (say 50) of employees
to pay a good portion of the health insurance premium for full-time employees
(could be defined as working more than 30 hours per week). The solution is not to punish the employer
and reduce the cost of health care delivery.
·
IPOs for local companies usually mean more jobs.
When we see a lot of IPOs in the U.S., we can predict the employment is
recovering.
·
Globalization changes
all the traditional, conventional wisdom.
Most large companies are global companies. Corporations find the best workers anywhere in the world at the least cost. Typically the US, EU and Japan design the high-valued products and their products are assembled in foreign lands where they can find cheaper, better and more flexible labor.
Most large companies are global companies. Corporations find the best workers anywhere in the world at the least cost. Typically the US, EU and Japan design the high-valued products and their products are assembled in foreign lands where they can find cheaper, better and more flexible labor.
Filler:
### Unemployment Report
###
Unemployment
rate has its faults. Many giving up seeking for jobs are not counted (i.e. the
participation rate). The new yardstick t is the improvement of median income
that has not been recovered from 2007. Many recent college graduates are not
working on the jobs of their choices and their college loans will not be paid
back soon. Globalization throws oil to the fire as corporations can hire the
best employees at the least costs anywhere in this planet.
18 H-1B visa
On my bus commute
to downtown, I noticed a lot of Indians and some Chinese besides myself. Many
of them are on H-1B visas and work in banks, insurance companies and brokerage
firms downtown. Some have applied or will apply for the green cards. Their
living standards have been improved greatly here and no one is naive enough to
wait for India to fix their infrastructure and offer similar job opportunities
for the equivalent salaries.
If you're a technical manager, which one would you want to hire:
If you're a technical manager, which one would you want to hire:
1. An H-1B visa
worker who will work hard for peanuts but gold to them when comparing to their
native country,
or
2. One who has no incentive to work hard except trying to get your job eventually.
We should encourage our children to get into science and math. Our system is great for creative folks like Steve Jobs, Gates, etc. However, the society does not need that many geniuses but folks with the right training. To illustrate, most well-paid, high-tech jobs are held by foreigners and children of foreigners who study in programming, engineering, science and math. These professionals are not geniuses, but they have the right training to enhance and / or market the products / services from the visions of the geniuses. From my rough estimate, we probably need one genius for every ten thousands of professionals such as engineers / programmers.
If we have enough qualified professionals, we can cut down H-1B visas; however the government has to give incentives to hire local professionals to offset the lower wages from most potential H-1B holders. Today and in the near future, we can't cut down these visas otherwise our high-tech industry will not be competitive. Most H-1B recipients eventually get their green cards, and move their parents to the U.S. burdening our welfare and entitlement systems. The employers do not care as this is not their problem. The alternative is setting up research / development centers in foreign countries such as India and China at the risk of proprietary secrets being stolen.
2. One who has no incentive to work hard except trying to get your job eventually.
We should encourage our children to get into science and math. Our system is great for creative folks like Steve Jobs, Gates, etc. However, the society does not need that many geniuses but folks with the right training. To illustrate, most well-paid, high-tech jobs are held by foreigners and children of foreigners who study in programming, engineering, science and math. These professionals are not geniuses, but they have the right training to enhance and / or market the products / services from the visions of the geniuses. From my rough estimate, we probably need one genius for every ten thousands of professionals such as engineers / programmers.
If we have enough qualified professionals, we can cut down H-1B visas; however the government has to give incentives to hire local professionals to offset the lower wages from most potential H-1B holders. Today and in the near future, we can't cut down these visas otherwise our high-tech industry will not be competitive. Most H-1B recipients eventually get their green cards, and move their parents to the U.S. burdening our welfare and entitlement systems. The employers do not care as this is not their problem. The alternative is setting up research / development centers in foreign countries such as India and China at the risk of proprietary secrets being stolen.
Afterthoughts
·
In 2014, there are 3 million (4 million for some
reports) jobs last year in the US are unfilled due to lack of skills while we
have many college graduates who cannot find a job. We have a serious problem of
skill gaps.
There are about 2 million unfilled positions desperately needed by programming including the cloud computing. Our high tech industry is expanding their training programs in order to fill these 'skills gap' positions.
There
is why the Congress is slapping permanent visas to those foreign students who
graduated in the US universities with the right training in science and
computer science and advocate larger number of H-1B visas.
Vocational
colleges and apprenticeship should be encouraged. The high school graduates
should match their careers to jobs that are plentiful. A college degree without
a job potential is a waste of money and time, not to mention the heavy loan
that will take years to repay. My plumber makes very good money with less than
a year of training.
# Filler
When we legalize the illegals, do
you think they are stupid enough to work instead of collecting welfare legally?
Who is doing to do the jobs that no welfare recipients want?
19 Too delicious to fall
Unions are
supposed to protect the working class from being exploited. Today unions reduce
our competitive edge by setting up higher compensation. Globalization weakens
the power of the union by moving some of our jobs to other countries such as
China and Mexico. We have to define two classes of jobs: jobs that can be
outsourced and jobs that cannot be. Some unions are more effective in the
latter category such as riding up telephone poles. Few mayors in big cities are
elected without the approval of the local police union, and hence some are
politically powerful.
Hostess's
fall is a bad day for capitalism, at least our style of capitalism. There is
too much blame to go around:
·
First, the management (and
the hedge fund managers) did not update their products to meet the trend of the
market.
·
Unions are out-of-touch. If
your patient is dying, you do not want to shake him hard. You need to have plan
B when you're bluffing. All in with bad cards is just dumb.
They're the parasites and they will die too when their host (hostess in our case) is dead. The dream of owning the company will remain to be a dream that they never want to wake up from. They tried to violate the basic business rule of supply and demand but failed miserably.
They're the parasites and they will die too when their host (hostess in our case) is dead. The dream of owning the company will remain to be a dream that they never want to wake up from. They tried to violate the basic business rule of supply and demand but failed miserably.
·
The workers are really dumb
to let their master manipulate them until they lose out big time. Do you think
you can protest and win in this kind of economy and the shaky state of the
company? Another common sense.
·
The politicians will not
bail them out especially it is long past the election. This time they cannot
buy votes by blaming China, as these jobs can't be outsourced (unless you want
to buy your Wonder bread shipped from China). Hence, even if it were before the
election, the government will not bail you out on the ground of ‘too delicious
to fall’.
It is a
lose-lose-lose (management-unions-workers) situation and only stupid folks will
get into this situation.
20 Generous welfare
Last Saturday, a television commenter
suggested legalizing illegal aliens and moving them to Detroit as that has
worked well before in several other American cities.
I totally
disagree with that notion. Instead we should ask the able poor to work and take
less welfare benefits to encourage businesses to move in and provide jobs.
In addition,
the city has to concentrate on education to provide an educated work force. It
does not take a genius on how to lure back businesses by protecting the
businesses first. If I open a business at the constant threat of being burned
down or being robbed, I do not open a business there.
We also have
to train the unemployed for jobs that are needed
by the society. Investing in education is productive, while giving out welfare
is not. It is a balancing act by the city administrators.
Unions and
generous welfare will work in the short-term for a specific group of the
society. In the long run, they will have opposite effects as demonstrated in
Detroit and many EU countries.
One cannot
survive by making the minimum wage in the USA. They will be subsidized with
welfare and you know we all have to pay for these benefits eventually. We need
to encourage folks to work by reducing the generous social welfare that should
go to the real needy and/or serve as a temporary safety net.
In Mass., the
system takes away free health care when the income is above a specific level.
It does not encourage the poor to work.
There are too
many frauds in our welfare system. We should take care of our citizens first
before we take in more immigrants who compete for the limited jobs available.
In addition,
when they are legalized, do you think they are stupid enough to work where receiving
welfare is a better deal? The newly legalized will help their immediate
families to immigrate and further burden our welfare system. At one time folks
came in to work for jobs that we do not want or we do not have the skills.
Today, some new immigrants ask for the closest welfare office on
the first day they arrive, or where is the closest hospital to give birth to a
USA citizen baby free of charge. Taiwan has a book titled “How to Retire Rich
in the USA with No Money and No Effort” from my memory. The objective is
seeking an easy life without work in the land of generous welfare; the rest of
the world calls us suckers!
Many Vietnamese refugees cheat on welfare. I do not blame them
considering the miseries they went thru. Most of them were government employees
(servants and soldiers) and Chinese merchants. Most are educated, hard-working
folks with tough experiences. In just one short generation, you do not find too
many of them collecting welfare and most become respectable and productive
citizens.
Afterthoughts
·
The welfare
department and the immigration department do not share information. I wonder
why the welfare officer does not check whether the applicant is legal or not.
We have an illegal alien in Boston who sued the employer successfully for not
paying minimum wages.
·
A 25 year old with 9 children received more than
100,000 per year without working. It is the best get-rich
scheme and a best-kept secret. Social security contributes about $8,850 per
month for each recipient in the family.
I did not write
this article. It was distributed to me. I hope it is an exception.
·
I debated whether
this article should be included in a book on investing. Generous welfare
benefits dampen our capitalist economy which eventually weighs down the economy
and the stock market.
·
Another subject of
debate is whether education improves employment as many college graduates have
been unemployed or under-employed for years. A city with well-educated citizens
usually has lower crime rates, which is a prime consideration for businesses.
Judging from bailing out big
businesses that are too big to fall, the government seems to be pro-business.
It is good for political campaigns to lay off fewer employees, but it is not
good for the economy in the long run.
·
Some suggest to
raising the minimum wage higher and even to the maximum wage. Sounds like
communism to me.
The authors found that in 11
states, “welfare pays more than the average pretax first-year wage for a
teacher. In 39 states, it pays more than the starting wage for a secretary.
And, in the three most generous states a person on welfare can take home more
money than an entry-level computer programmer.”
·
The USA citizens can
be divided into 3 groups according to taxes they’re paying:
1.
About 40% not paying
Federal tax. When this group grows, we will bankrupt. Representation without
taxation is worse than taxation without representation.
2.
Middle class. We're
being squeezed by the other two groups.
3.
The rich 5%. They pay
most of the taxes. However, in the last two years, they're fleeing to other
places that have low tax treatments. The geese that lay the golden eggs are
flying away. Without them, we're squeezed even harder until we’re forced to
move to the first group and bankrupt the country.
21 Effective health care delivery
ObamaCare will have an impact on
businesses. Large businesses will gain an edge over small businesses unless
there will be subsidy and that will add to our deficit. Small businesses will
suffer with several side effects:
·
They will work around from the requirements of
forced health care insurance by limiting the number of hours of an employee and
the number of employees.
·
Most of the new ventures are seeded from money
from their home equity loans. With falling home prices, they will have less new
businesses. The banks already have more restrictions in loaning money since
2007.
Most proposals on health care
delivery do not care about how to cut down costs, and how to make it fair and
practical. We need to know how to pay for it first, how much, and the
consequences to businesses and employment. My proposal and comments:
1. Basic
treatments for all.
Better coverage is paid by an individual. We should
encourage folks to work hard and there is no more free lunch. It is abnormal
for the poor to have free health care while the middle class do not enjoy the
same. The poor in Mass. receive free health care. I hesitate to visit a doctor
as I have to pay even after the insurance.
2. Fair
regulation for nursing home.
Those with low incomes and/or those without a house
most likely can receive free nursing home care, free drugs and free doctor
visits in most states such as Mass. Those in borderline qualify for the free
nursing home care by giving their houses to their children, hiding their
incomes and/or just quit working. They are lazy but not stupid.
The government should spend an agreed percentage of the GDP on public
health care. We can use the average percent from developed countries or let the
voters decide. We cannot ignore other spending such as education or let the
budget unbalanced irresponsibly.
When we over spend on any entitlement, there needs to be a corresponding hike in taxes. High taxes reduce the United States’ global competitiveness and lead to more unemployment.
When we over spend on any entitlement, there needs to be a corresponding hike in taxes. High taxes reduce the United States’ global competitiveness and lead to more unemployment.
3. Prevention:
Voluntary and non-voluntary (via taxes) on smoking, fast food, soda, etc. It is
fair for the citizens to take care of their own health. You can select to live recklessly
in unhealthy life style, but the rest of us should not be burdened with your
bad habit. In his book The China Study, Dr. Campbell recommends a whole food,
plant-based diet that would reduce a lot of diseases.
When we ban smoking totally, many hospitals ought to free up many resources. In addition, the second-hand smoke kills too. Why should we die for your bad behavior? The children of parents with drug problems have higher chance of birth defeat and problems than the average.
When we ban smoking totally, many hospitals ought to free up many resources. In addition, the second-hand smoke kills too. Why should we die for your bad behavior? The children of parents with drug problems have higher chance of birth defeat and problems than the average.
4. Limit
lawsuit award on malpractice.
Our health care cost is being jacked up partly due to the legal expenses.
Most do not realize these lawsuit awards will pass back to us. It is also the reason why the doctor would hesitate to care for us when we fall and lie in the street or why our clinical charges are so high. Lawyers and insurers get their share.
Most do not realize these lawsuit awards will pass back to us. It is also the reason why the doctor would hesitate to care for us when we fall and lie in the street or why our clinical charges are so high. Lawyers and insurers get their share.
5. State-of-the-art
treatments are less effective than prevention such as a low-dosage aspirin for
all over 50 years of age and the routine shots for babies / children. Aspirin
is the miracle drug that is hated by all drug companies due to the low profit
margin.
6. Outsourcing
the expensive treatments to foreign countries and drug development / clinical
tests.
Our
costs are outrageously high. Try some Caribbean countries, Thailand or Shanghai
for example. The money we save pays for a free vacation, not mentioning the
free massage every day for the entire trip in Thailand. Many Caribbean
countries offer same dentistry services at half the cost.
This is a temporary solution until we solve our high cost problem.
This is a temporary solution until we solve our high cost problem.
7. Cut
down the expensive drug marketing (such as giving money / goodies to doctors).
Personally I know doctors receiving free golf trips to the most expensive golf courses for the entire family. They also got unlimited lobsters in medical conventions in Boston. Should doctors receive the 'lecture fees' giving phony lectures or sales pitches in return of recommending the drugs or prescribing them to their patients?
Guess who end up paying for all these goodies eventually?
Personally I know doctors receiving free golf trips to the most expensive golf courses for the entire family. They also got unlimited lobsters in medical conventions in Boston. Should doctors receive the 'lecture fees' giving phony lectures or sales pitches in return of recommending the drugs or prescribing them to their patients?
Guess who end up paying for all these goodies eventually?
8. Stop
the illegal aliens and foreigners from using our medical systems free.
Their employers or the patients should pay for their expenses. It is nice
to help the rest of the world, but we do not have money to do so now.
Emergency room is the most expensive delivery method and its usage has been abused.
Emergency room is the most expensive delivery method and its usage has been abused.
9. Before
we send soldiers abroad or explore space (both have some merits but the average
citizen does not benefit from these ventures), should we solve our home
problems such as health care first? Get our priority straight.
10. The
average last two years of one's life would be the most expensive health care
cost. Many do not want to live through pains and sufferings. Should we let them
pass away in peace if they want to?
11. Stem
cell research has proven to be promising.
We should not let our politicians dictate the policy
for religious reasons. The desperate will go to foreign countries to receive
the riskiest treatments anyway. Why let them know their risk and do the
treatments here in a better environment?
12. Stop
all the insurance and Medicare frauds. If you spend $10,000 on inspectors and
get back $1 million, it is a great investment. Whistle blowing is the most
efficient way to prosecute violators. Each successful, publicized prosecution
warns thousands of potential violators.
13. Importing
foreign doctors and nurses is the worst we can do to a poor country.
These
foreigners are seeking a better economic life for themselves, but forget their
original purpose of seeking these noble professions. Why we send aids to these
poor countries and steal their medical resources?
Afterthoughts
Finally we have a national health
care system. Give it a chance to succeed. Have to give credit to Obama to start
ObamaCare in a recession.
Roughly we spend double the
average developed country on health care per capita but our health care system
is rated as average.
A joke on outsourcing our medical delivery to China:
The hurting patient pleaded
painfully to the outsourced doctor to get him someone who could speak English.
The doctor said, “If I not English, what language I talking?
Filler:
### Need
a high speed rail?
"Medium speed" is
available now by just taking away the cell phone from the train engineer
22 How to solve trade imbalance
The U.S.'s wage of
$20 per hour cannot compete with the $2 per hour (no matter it is from China,
India or Vietnam).
You cannot live
with the $2 per hour wage in the U.S. It is easier and better to live on
welfare with food stamp, housing subsidies, free health care (in some states)
and many other freebies, when your income is low or $0. Our generous welfare
encourages our citizens to be lazy and some cheat on the declaration of their
incomes. The disability claims excluding veterans from the wars increase
substantially in the last decade even our work environment is far safer. It
also encourages our citizens not to save.
The solutions are (some are satires with a J):
The solutions are (some are satires with a J):
·
Abandon industries that use low-wage labor and /
or outsource manufacturing jobs like what Apple is doing.
There is no
quality problem with Apple’s products that are outsourced to China, so it
really depends on the company who outsources and how the product quality checks
are conducted. Apple is making good money, paying taxes, hiring top earners and
at the same time providing great and affordable products to the world. As of
2012, Apple is the most valuable company in the U.S at least for a brief
period.
·
Take out the embargo of military products to
China at least on the products that China can obtain from other sources such as
Russia and some European countries. Currently, it does not serve the purpose of
preventing China from becoming a military power and we’re losing the sales.
Why should we
be afraid of China when our military might is far, far away from any country on
earth? We can sell China missiles with no fear. Just program the missiles to
return to the sender when the GPS detects it is heading to our direction. My
genius idea just saves us billions of dollarsJ.
·
Beg China and other countries to loan us more
money with states as collateral (by now no one is stupid enough to use the USD
and loan us without collaterals) starting with all non-Democratic states first
(according to Obama) and Washington, D.C. will be the last to sell. Just a jokeJ. As in a capitalist system, if you cannot service
you loans, you have to give up your collaterals.
·
Selling Alaska back to Russia (with SarahJ) for oil is a no brainer. It is just like killing
two birds with one stone.
Selling Hawaii is just genius like selling something we do not own. Most properties in Hawaii are owned by Japanese already.
Selling Hawaii is just genius like selling something we do not own. Most properties in Hawaii are owned by Japanese already.
If we sold
NYC to China, we would make a huge, huge capital gain. It is even more sweet if
you recall we bought (cheated is a better word) a good piece of NYC from some
native Indians for trinkets. The Indians / Eskimos were Chinese crossing the
frozen strait due to losing their direction after too many hot drinks. I have
my genes to prove my theory. So, it is the same as selling to the original
owner for a huge gain without paying any taxes.
In reality,
we sold Manhattan to a casino operator. Wall Street is the biggest legal
casino. The only difference is all the hotels are outside the casino. Sell
Silicon Valley to China and the rest of California to Mexico (similar to
selling Florida to Cuba if they can pay for it).
The only
place you cannot get rid of is Washington D.C. No buyer can live with the lazy
government servants and politicians fighting each other every day to see who is
on top.
It is the
similar to the bankers foreclosing your house when you cannot service your
mortgage. I hope it will remain as a joke forever.
·
Close all trades with all foreign countries but
we have to enjoy the $50 toaster that is produced by the U.S. workers! The U.S.
is one of the few nations that can close out all foreign trades and survive.
However, the movie and music industries will suffer and decline. Boeing will
have to park their shiny planes in the desert to collect sand. We will have so
much grain in storage that eventually we will have more rats than people.
·
Without the rare earths from China, our Apple
products will cost double and our missiles will cost us far more. However, it
would be good for the world as folks will use their Apple products longer and
fewer missiles will be produced.
The chicken feet would be better thrown into
ocean instead of shipping them to China for cash.
##
Technical metrics in market peak, bottom & correction
|
SMA-50
|
SMA-200
|
SMA-
350
|
SMA50/
SMA200
|
RSI
(14)
|
Market
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peak
|
|
5%
|
9%
|
101%
|
65%
|
Bottom
|
|
-32%
|
-31%
|
78%
|
25%
|
Correction
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peak
|
4%
|
6%
|
11%
|
102%
|
65%
|
Bottom
|
-5%
|
-6%
|
-7%
|
97%
|
26%
|
Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peak
|
|
|
|
|
70%
|
Bottom
|
|
|
|
|
30%
|
### Joke ###
Measure the success in one's life
Contrary to popular belief, your
success in life is not measured by how many friends or how many stocks you
have. It is measured by:
When we die, we're
When we die, we're
smart with all toys;
dumb with all toys not upgraded
(Disclosure: I've stocks on Apple);
stupid with all money not
converted to toys;
genius with all toys being shared
with the poor (Gates and Buffett).
23 Modify our election system
Our voting system works but it has problems that need to be
addressed as follows:
1. Reduce campaign money.
When politicians spend a substantial amount of time in
fundraising, they have not concentrated their efforts on the important issues
such as the economy. Gun control was not even mentioned in the last election
despite we have constant shootouts. We need to set a limit in the amount of the
campaign money they can raise and they can spend. Hence, the presidency is not
won by how rich you are and / or your party is, but how you can resolve our
problems.
2. Over-promising for votes.
The last election was so close and the outcome could have been
altered by the inclusion of Hispanic votes. The changing of the legal residency
status could create many legal welfare recipients to further burden our
bankrupting country. If the welfare is so generous, why should they work when
they are legalized?
3. Special interest groups.
The politicians optimize their policy to favor the special
interest groups who finance the campaigns. Entitlement recipients belong to
another group. They ought to be paid according to how much they have
contributed. The social security system was designed for life expectancy less
than 70.
I would include the big businesses in the special interest
groups. Via their connections, they had been bailed out many times. In short,
it is a conflict of interest.
4. We need to set up a ballot to indicate what percentage of our tax
money will go to a specific budget, such as offense, education, etc. Spending
too much on one budget would hurt other budgets. I would like to spend less
than 2% on offense. Why we need a carrier driven by dual nuclear reactors and
still ask for more defense expenditures?
5. Representation without taxation is worse than taxation without
representation.
The votes of those who do not pay any Federal taxes, the mentally
challenged or those with low IQs, the uneducated, and the criminals should be
counted as at most half votes. The votes of all veterans should be counted at
least one and a half as they sacrifice their lives for the country. A kind of
controversial at first glance!
We have about 50% illiterates in Detroit. The politicians have to
satisfy these voters in order to get their votes. It is not hard to predict the
collapse of the city. Taxing the rich and giving more to the poor seems to be
good deeds similar to Robin Hood. However, businesses cannot function over
there and they have options to leave. It is another example that uncontrolled
socialism could lead to self-destruction.
6. I suggest the second term of the presidency should be 6 years
instead of 4. This is the term that the presidents usually do well for the
country to build up his or her legacy without caring about votes for him or
her. Today, most second-term presidents have only 1 ½ years to do so.
The following are related to governance but should be discussed
during the election.
7. Need to balance the budget. It should be a constitutional law. We
cannot pass our debts to the next generation forever. Most states require
balancing their budget, why not the Federal government?
8. Need a long debate in the Congress before we can start another
war. Most major wars from Vietnam War to the current two Middle East wars cause
most of our financial problems. We are not wealthy enough to be the world’s
policeman, and fighting for ideology and freedom for other countries. Being #1
or a big brother is not important when our economy is bankrupting and most our
graduates cannot find jobs.
9.
Need to encourage the
able poor to work and be educated to break the cycle of poverty. There are too
many holes and misinterpretations in Clinton’s law to force welfare
recipients to work.
10. Need
to control government expenses by a smaller and more efficient government and
cut frauds such as Medicaid and disability entitlements SSDL. Increasing government employees and assigning them small
workloads is reckless consumption.
To illustrate, building a road to improve transportation is
productive, but defending other countries is consumption (unless the benefits
justify).
Afterthoughts
·
Why we shut down the government due to
the debt ceiling? Run the government like what businesses
do. Calculate the rate of return in the following two options.
1. Benefit in shutting down the government.
1. Benefit in shutting down the government.
or
2. Benefit in not shutting down the government.
Select the option that gives us better benefit.
The majority of government employees have tiny workloads (most got their jobs in DC due to what party they belong to). Furlough (layoff could be better just like most businesses do) half of them and it would maintain the same service if they work in the private sector. A win-win decision.
Closing all the free museums (say in DC) will cost a lot of pains to tourists and future tourism. Actually it costs more than 10 times of the saved wages in shutting down. Only the stupidest managers make this kind of easy decision.
2. Benefit in not shutting down the government.
Select the option that gives us better benefit.
The majority of government employees have tiny workloads (most got their jobs in DC due to what party they belong to). Furlough (layoff could be better just like most businesses do) half of them and it would maintain the same service if they work in the private sector. A win-win decision.
Closing all the free museums (say in DC) will cost a lot of pains to tourists and future tourism. Actually it costs more than 10 times of the saved wages in shutting down. Only the stupidest managers make this kind of easy decision.
However, our government makes decisions based on politics: Want to show who is the boss and put the blame on the other party. They are all wasting our time, money and energy. We need to have smaller and efficient government.
When the problem is resolved (by approving funding or moving the debt ceiling even higher), both sides will declare victory shamelessly on how smart they ‘fixed’ the problem to insult your intelligence.
·
Usually we vote for the candidates we associate
with without considering the ideas and the qualifications of the candidates.
That is evidenced from the reactions of the O.J. Simpson’s verdict from the
students of a black college and the students of a white college. This is bad
for the country.
Filler:
###
I was deeply moved by the family
members of the church victims forgiving the shooter. At SeekingAlpha, I wrote a
brief post: "Forgive" is the most powerful word in every language and
in every culture. I forgot it until I received a response today from Jim.
"Tony,
Without even knowing it, you made the greatest comment I have seen on Seeking Alpha--and it had nothing to do with investing. You mentioned somewhere that "Forgive" is the most powerful word in every language. Wow.
I shared that with my children. Financial commentary is easily forgotten, but that will stay with me forever. Thank you for that.
Jim"
Jim, forgive me to publicize your email as I hope to spread the word to others. I cannot take any credit as it is just common sense except for those who do not go to church. The credit should be given to the forgiving family members and to the preaching of the church. With the power of forgiveness, we should not have the wars in the Middle East, past, present and future.
"Tony,
Without even knowing it, you made the greatest comment I have seen on Seeking Alpha--and it had nothing to do with investing. You mentioned somewhere that "Forgive" is the most powerful word in every language. Wow.
I shared that with my children. Financial commentary is easily forgotten, but that will stay with me forever. Thank you for that.
Jim"
Jim, forgive me to publicize your email as I hope to spread the word to others. I cannot take any credit as it is just common sense except for those who do not go to church. The credit should be given to the forgiving family members and to the preaching of the church. With the power of forgiveness, we should not have the wars in the Middle East, past, present and future.
24 The Republican Convention
Why
do we need to know Mitt (or any candidate from any political party) is
officially nominated or he will accept the nomination? Who has turned it down in our history? If
this is the main purpose of the convention, it is a TOTAL waste of money and
time that can be used to deal with our real problems such as how to cut down
spending. Isn’t it ironic or demonstrating how the big government wastes our
money or how big business buys influence?
If
you really do not know whom will be nominated (I'm shamelessly insulting your
intelligence and assuming you have been living in a cave for the last year), just
watch the news on TV and save millions.
The convention must be sponsored by airlines, hotels, restaurants and Florida or big businesses / special groups wanting influences. The hidden sponsors are the prostitutes and the drug companies who provide Viagra and condones. They are the winners of this convention, not the handsome Mitt and his lovely wife. All the conventioneers using other folks’ money to wine and dine are the free loaders and parasites. Sorry to offend all the politicians and their running dogs.
I like to attend any convention if someone is stupid or rich enough to pay for this unearned but lavish vacation – I’ll vote whatever you want me to. Sign me up for any convention, Republican or Democratic, now or future. I hope it will be in Hawaii or somewhere without any hurricane and with great and expensive food. You will pay for it eventually one way or another.
I
must have some mental problems if I talk to an empty chair with a ghost rocking
on it. When you guys laugh at the chair, you might have a more serious mental problem
than I. Even with no one sitting on it, the chair still rocks. It symbolizes
the do-nothing government could be the best government as it rocks! My point is
we need a small, frugal and effective government. The best government is
invisible but it provides all the basic services at the least cost!
Afterthoughts: More
25 How to solve our economic problems
The
United States is still rich and powerful, so the economy should be easier to
fix. However, we all have to bite the bullet. Bailing out everyone only buys votes
for the politicians and will not help the economy in the longer term. The economy
affects everyone and it should not be a political game. Here are some of my
thoughts.
·
When GE does not pay any tax to the U.S. but to
some foreign countries, we've a problem. So are many U.S. companies which
should be headquartered in the U.S. instead of in some foreign countries. We've
not done enough to lure them back and give them incentive to stay. At least we
need to force them to pay taxes on the profits they made in the U.S.
It is similar
to the cruise ship companies. They pay minimal taxes even most are the ‘real’
headquartered in the USA and most of their customers are USA citizens.
·
The rich should pay their fair share of taxes.
If we force them to pay more than their share, they will move elsewhere. This
is the straw that breaks the camel's back or killing the goose that lays the
golden eggs. The top 10% rich folks paid 70% of all Federal tax collected in
2010, up from 55% in 1986.
More than 40% of the total
population did not pay Federal income tax and they received most welfare
benefits and entitlements. Our socialist system would bankrupt when it does not
have any to give.
·
Relax the environmental enforcement on drilling
and start the construction of the pipe lines such as the one from Canada. We
may have more than enough trapped natural gas for the next 50 years. Now, oil
countries are dumping oil to fight off our shale energy. Should we have a new
tariff to protect our industry?
·
The complicated regulations, religious concerns
and the high legal expenses force some drug companies move the research
elsewhere. If nothing is being done, I predict Asia will be the center to
produce more new drugs in the next decade and we will lose the competitive
edge.
·
We need to limit the unemployment obligations
and the burden of ObamaCare to small businesses.
·
We should give companies the rich incentives to
take risk to start business and new ventures here, or they will invest
elsewhere. Investment creates jobs.
·
There are many ways to balance the budget.
We need to cut the entitlements. We need to encourage the able poor to work instead of receiving welfare. Why should they work if work means cutting the housing subsidies, food stamp and free health care (in many states including Mass.)?
We need to cut the entitlements. We need to encourage the able poor to work instead of receiving welfare. Why should they work if work means cutting the housing subsidies, food stamp and free health care (in many states including Mass.)?
We cannot tax the rich to the
max. I belong to the middle class and I cannot give up my citizenship, my
social security and Medicare that I contributed during my work life. However,
the rich can and they even come back to live here as a foreign citizen. It has
happened to many high-tax countries and we never learn.
There are many U.S. jobs that are
being done by illegal aliens. Check out who pick your lettuce, or empties your
waste basket in your office. The poor should take up these jobs instead of
fixing up their motor bikes, or watching TV all day long. When we legalize the
illegals, will these new residents collect welfare instead of working?
Hiring more
employees for government jobs is the most inefficient way to boost employment,
as our government is too big already. We can cut down half of them without
degrading the services as most are working half of the time already.
We cannot afford the two wars; one war costs
us $2 billion a week. Many well-known projects overseas cost about $2 billion
each. Why we need a carrier powered by two nuclear generators is beyond my
comprehension when we have more weapons to destroy the entire world by pressing
a button. Should we solve our problems first such as Detroit before we send
soldiers abroad and/or help foreign countries?
All
the measures should be executed gradually to avoid the so-called fiscal cliff
and related problems in different terms. I'm in IT and now in investing. I do
not know much about social science and economy, but they're just common sense.
Afterthoughts
Filler:
12 noon is not 12 pm
The Chinese restaurant I went to
says they open at 12 am. Are they wrong or the world is wrong?
The next hour from 11 am is 12 am, NOT 12 pm. The one who set it up did it totally wrong and no one complains until now. If I were born earlier, I would have corrected it. If I were born here, I would be the president and every one would have a job by now.
The same if I stayed with the Fed (I actually worked for them briefly and I still had the key to the executive rest room to prove it), we would not have this financial mess today.
Or, if I played for the Celtics (I need two more feet), they would not have a losing season.
Or, if I were the couch (I need to have a brain first), the Patriots should've selected to receive on OT this afternoon. I would cover my error by saying we would not give the Jets a better draft pick, so we let them win intentionally.
If I were more humble, I would not have written this stupid post but I see the ‘stupid’ smile on your face.
The next hour from 11 am is 12 am, NOT 12 pm. The one who set it up did it totally wrong and no one complains until now. If I were born earlier, I would have corrected it. If I were born here, I would be the president and every one would have a job by now.
The same if I stayed with the Fed (I actually worked for them briefly and I still had the key to the executive rest room to prove it), we would not have this financial mess today.
Or, if I played for the Celtics (I need two more feet), they would not have a losing season.
Or, if I were the couch (I need to have a brain first), the Patriots should've selected to receive on OT this afternoon. I would cover my error by saying we would not give the Jets a better draft pick, so we let them win intentionally.
If I were more humble, I would not have written this stupid post but I see the ‘stupid’ smile on your face.
26 Implementation
As
of 2015, this recession is the longest in my memory. Usually we have recessions
that last for two to four years and then we recover. Some recent college
graduates have been out-of-work for over four years and many work on jobs that
they do not have to go to college for.
It
could be due to the failed stimulations, printing too much money and the
bailouts that did not fix the root problem. If we did not do the above, there
is a better chance for a faster recovery than a deeper recession. Hopefully
2016 will be the year we finally recover, but only time can tell.
We
need to let big businesses fall. No one is too big to fall. Let nature take
care of itself. If you cheat and / or do not perform, you need to be out of
business. It is Business 101 and the fundamental of our capitalist system. Why
it is so hard to understand? Why do we need to bail out companies that should
fail? Why the greedy CEOs have not gone to jail? Why they were rewarded with
bonuses from our bailout money to bring down the companies?
Our problems are easier to fix than they appear to be. I can think of many easy solutions, so the politicians who are hundreds of times smarter than I (or at least make hundreds of times my salary) must have many solutions already.
Our problems are easier to fix than they appear to be. I can think of many easy solutions, so the politicians who are hundreds of times smarter than I (or at least make hundreds of times my salary) must have many solutions already.
Identifying the problems and finding solutions are the easy part. However, the implementation is hard, as the agenda of all politicians is simple: Get reelected. They have to satisfy the special interest groups who finance their campaigns and the voters who do not want to bite the bullet. When we have more voters benefitting from welfare and entitlements than the tax payers, we’re going to be a welfare state. In addition, big businesses control our government via special interest groups; I call it corruption, American style. When one party takes over the other party after the election, most politicians and their helpers get jobs from the companies that they gave favors to.
27 Solve our deficit problem
We should have a 10% corporate tax, a 3% VAT and extra 2% for
luxury goods.
Advantages:
Advantages:
·
All the corporate
golden geese will not flock back.
·
Our dividends will
not be taxed twice.
·
Corporations will
plow back the money for investment and hence ignite employment.
·
VAT discourages unnecessary
consumption and spending. The 2% surcharge for the rich is fair and simple. The
above numbers are arbitrary. We need to set up a budget and require the
government to enforce it. If we have excess, we can cut down the income tax
that would encourage working.
You may say we do not have money to run the government. It is
simpler than expected.
·
A small and efficient
government.
If you're one of the lazy government employees surfing the net and waiting for the 4 pm stampede (after the two-hour lunch followed by your nice afternoon lap), you know exactly what I'm talking.
If you're one of the lazy government employees surfing the net and waiting for the 4 pm stampede (after the two-hour lunch followed by your nice afternoon lap), you know exactly what I'm talking.
·
Why the government
employees can retire at almost full pension at the early age (comparing to
corporate employees) is just beyond my comprehension.
·
Stop being the world
police. We've more problems to solve at home.
·
Cut down the generous
welfare and ask the able to get off the couch. Watching TV all day long for the
rest of your life is boring and not good for your health. Remember when we run
out of money to give you, the host and the parasite will die together
·
Prosecute the welfare
and disability cheaters.
·
Prevent illegals to come in
by prosecuting employers. If there are no jobs, they will not come. We do not
need all those fences and patrols.
28 The first sip of coffee
Our
politicians are 100 times smarter than I, 100,000 times richer than I,
handsomer than I (debatable for most esp. Trump)..., why they always made the
wrong decisions? Simple answer. Their agenda is buying votes and mine is for
the good of our country. Here are the easy fixes.
* Corporate headquarter exodus. Lower their taxes first.
* Health care problem. Lower the medical expenses first.
* Corporate headquarter exodus. Lower their taxes first.
* Health care problem. Lower the medical expenses first.
* Building border walls like the Great Wall of China. Punish the employers who hire the illegals first.
* Social welfare. Do not punish folks for working and give more welfare to workers than those able welfare recipients. It is similar on how to dissolve multi generation of teen-age mothers.
* Fight terrorism. Understand why they want to be one (patriot for them). Think like one on how to give us maximum pain with the least resources.
* Improve the economy so everyone has a job. Our 'offense' budget is more than the next four countries combined. Unless for our own benefits, do not send soldiers overseas. Today's weapons are missiles and cyber security, so how many soldiers we need?
* If we learn the prediction from the Bible or the endless religious wars, we would not be involved in the Middle East conflict.
* Learn from history. Are we threatened by the communist Vietnam today? We should have learned it from the French.
Just write down this list at the first sip of coffee. It could be an endless list.
Filler:
Why I do not run for the presidency you
may ask? Nobody would understand my English (not my native language). However,
it could be strongest point as I dislike most politicians after I find out
their real motives.
IV China & miscellaneous
29 Free trade with China
Free trade
has its benefits (especially for consumers) and some minor disadvantages (fewer
jobs to our workers for example). You do not want to grow sugar cane in Alaska.
Chicken feet are delicacy in China, but they are not fit here to eat even
for our cattle.
With free
trade, we trade our excess products and products we
have knowledge to produce (such as our high-tech products and movies) for
products we do not or cannot produce here economically.
When one
country produces the best product at the least price, she is a winner and so
are the consumers of all the countries who import this product.
Apple’s products
are good examples of the free trade in taking advantage of the best
contributions from many countries. Apple’s products are global products: U.S.A.
designs and markets, China assembles them and provides rare earth elements,
Taiwan invests and manages manufacturing, and many countries provide
specialized components. The results are excellent products that consumers all
over the world enjoy at reasonable prices.
However, we have to ensure all partners play fairly. If China dumps products to force our shops to close and then raise prices later, then we have to step in. However, so far it does not happen often. They do dump some products to secure jobs. It has been a trade practice that Microsoft had done before with its Office software when it came late to the market.
Dumping rare
earth elements actually benefits the rest of the world. It does not benefit
China as the environmental damages are far worse than the benefits. All
developed countries ask China to continue dumping their rare earth elements,
which actually are ready to mine in many parts of the world. Why some products
dumped by China are OK and most are not?
As the USA
subsidizes our industries with free research grants and farm loans, it is quite
hard to accuse China for doing the same. All countries subsidize industries in
one way or another. What excuses are we looking for when we cannot compete some
products with China?
When China or any country offers the cheapest and the best product to us, our consumers win. In addition, when China makes money on the low-end products, they will have money to buy our more expensive high-tech products, jets, movies and farm products to name a few.
China loans
us money to buy her products and hence keep her workers working. The debt
obligation is less when we devalue our own currency; we pay back our loan with
depreciated dollars. By doing this the USA is actually the currency
manipulator! Will China continue to loan us money at this rate? I do not think
so at least not to be paid back in depreciating USD.
We need to limit our spending - wars by our government and big houses by our consumers. We cannot borrow forever. China and the oil-rich countries loan us money with their hidden agenda. The logic is so simple that even I, who has never taken any economic class, can understand.
As of 2016,
China is no longer a low-wage country; that goes to Vietnam. However, low wage
is only one factor and the others are political stability, infrastructure,
educated work force and large internal market with fewer tariffs. This article is
from the Chinese perspective.
# Filler:
#
If Jack can succeed, everyone can
#
Jack Ma of Alibaba is a smart man
who can control and change his destiny despite all the setbacks and how little
he inherited (I'm not talking about his look). The richest man in China cannot
improve his look and health. In addition, money cannot buy everything including
job satisfaction, respect, happiness, freedom, and clean air to name a few.
30 The stormy China Sea
If there were a war between China
and Japan (the #2 and #3 economy), the US (#1 economy) will most likely support
Japan and all the forecasts in this book will be off and we will return to a
global recession.
There have been disputes on the
ownership of some islets between China, Taiwan, Japan, Korea, Indonesia, Philippines
and Vietnam for the presumed oil or gas in the near-by seas. The disputes have
been mild for over 40 years (I remember the protest when I was a college
student) and no side wants to do anything until recently. All these
countries would not want to agitate China and China would not want to harm the
trading relationships. Now, the U.S. wants to side with countries against
China. With the backing of the U.S.'s Seventh Fleet and the U.S.'s promises,
all these countries suddenly cry out loudly for the last few years.
If China starts the dispute initially, China grossly miscalculates and grossly underestimates the military might of the U.S. navy. If Japan resumes the dispute, they are risking losing trade (#1 export to China) and the tourists from China.
It is the U.S.'s intention to
remain as #1 and the big brother in this part of the globe. It is not a wise
decision unless we still live in the past glory when you're either my puppet or
my enemy. Most likely, it is decided by the politicians who want to divert our
attentions as they cannot resolve our problems such as employment. The
government still wants to be the global leader (to another recession?) by
giving and spending billions here and there.
If the U.S. wants to promote
selling weapons to Asian countries (the U.S. is #1 in exporting weapons), we
are playing a risky game and the potential profit most likely will not justify
the consequences.
China might withdraw the loans and we would be back to the
worst depression in our history. It is quite dumb for China to loan us money to
build the Asian missile wall against N. Korea and most probably against China.
When Japan and Korea fight against each other over the disputed islet, which
position would we want to side with? If your answer is both, should we send
missiles from one of our battleships to another one of our own?
We cannot afford another war. We've spent more than $1.4
trillion in the two current wars so far and it is still counting. We cannot
visualize how much is one billion, not to mention one trillion. The current
tallest building in the world (in Dubai) costs about $1.5 billion. We can build
about nine hundred (900, not a typo) tallest buildings in the world and not
even fathom of how many jobs would be created.
Wars cause human suffering. China is not a tiger now, but it is far from a paper tiger. Japan's navy is stronger than most folks in the U.S. can ever imagine. Japan has been the aggressor to China for centuries and she has been war criminals against Korea, China and most other Asian countries in WW2. They have not compensated all the damages to Asian countries that they destroyed during WW2. Their leaders still pay respect to the war criminals in their ‘shrines’ and rewrite history books not admitting Nanjing Massacre had happened.
As usual, we always pick up the brick, aim and hit our own big toe. It was Vietnam, then the two wars in Middle East and now potential wars in China Sea. We have not yet learned lessons from the French, the Brits and the Russians who had been to Vietnam, Afghan and they all lost big.
No politicians would tell us that all our troubles are due to the high expense of the wars we participated in. We have had about 20 years of secular bear market due to the Vietnam War, followed by about 20 years of secular bull market due to the lack of war. Our stock market has been rescued by excessive money printing but not the economy. At the meantime, many of us do not have jobs or are under employed.
Wars cause human suffering. China is not a tiger now, but it is far from a paper tiger. Japan's navy is stronger than most folks in the U.S. can ever imagine. Japan has been the aggressor to China for centuries and she has been war criminals against Korea, China and most other Asian countries in WW2. They have not compensated all the damages to Asian countries that they destroyed during WW2. Their leaders still pay respect to the war criminals in their ‘shrines’ and rewrite history books not admitting Nanjing Massacre had happened.
As usual, we always pick up the brick, aim and hit our own big toe. It was Vietnam, then the two wars in Middle East and now potential wars in China Sea. We have not yet learned lessons from the French, the Brits and the Russians who had been to Vietnam, Afghan and they all lost big.
No politicians would tell us that all our troubles are due to the high expense of the wars we participated in. We have had about 20 years of secular bear market due to the Vietnam War, followed by about 20 years of secular bull market due to the lack of war. Our stock market has been rescued by excessive money printing but not the economy. At the meantime, many of us do not have jobs or are under employed.
The disputes
will not be good for all countries involved. The U.S. does not have sufficient
resources to start another war. Hope it will not happen. Let the sleeping dogs
lie and silence is golden. Hope the disputed countries
will share the resources instead of fighting for it. China has been bullied for
300 years since the Opium Wars. I sincerely hope they will not bully other
countries when they’re stronger.
31 Japan 2014
Japan is not the Japan 25 years
ago. As of 2016, I do not want to invest in Japan.
The policy has failed and the new
policy is basically the same as the old one. Their problems are:
1. Agitate
their major partner China on the disputed islets, which should belong to Taiwan
by proximity. They're losing trade from China while China can buy the equipment
and technology from many other sources.
2. The
virtually zero interest rate (now negative rate) does not work before and it
will not work in the future.
3. The
higher tax and higher inflation in Japan will lower the living standard in
Japan.
4. Any
surge in export is just a mirage and cannot be sustained in the long run.
5. The
recent Tsunami and earthquake will hurt Japan for another decade. I do not want
to visit the affected area or eat any food products produced from the Tsunami
area.
6. The
impact of Japan's aging population is the worst among nations and is worsened
by not welcoming immigrants. The smart and hard-working citizens are their
major resource.
7. The
baggage from the war crimes in WW2 to its Asian neighbors is still a burden.
Japanese never compensate the comfort women who are disappearing fast due to
aging. Japanese leaders pay respect to the war criminals in the ‘shrines’ every
year, similar to paying homage to Hitler. I have moved on as the current
generation are educated and will not commit the same war crimes.
Afterthoughts
·
The point of this blog is not on the dispute
itself but on: Why does the dispute re-surfaces after 50 or so years? I suspect
it is the U.S.'s hidden agenda. My guesses are: Helped Obama reelected, the
U.S. returning to S.E. Asia, selling weapons in the region (the U.S. is already
#1 in weapon export), containing China...
·
In Asia, Japan, India and China are all building
carriers. It is not a good hint for peace.
·
My Sentimental Journey: Nanjing Massacre.
·
Does war benefit the economy? Yes, to some
extent. No, for the long term to me.
Norman: War got us out of the Great Depression in
1941. The inflation is a future problem,
ducking the missiles is the current concern.
War is a powerful business model and the countries over produce.
·
China and Japan (a country with very few natural
resources) will fight for natural resources. Most resources are stable but the
global population is increasing. The rule of Supply and Demand will push the
prices of most commodities (including farm products and water) higher.
·
As of 5/2014, Vietnam riots destroyed several
Chinese corporations over the disputed islets.
Investing in S.E. Asia is risky now. Vietnam will suffer from foreign
investment and tourism for 3 or more years.
32 China by 2020
By the time 2020, China will catch up with the USA in GDP. China has about 4 times the population of the USA, so the average income is 4 times less than ours. Hopefully the following will tell the China story better.
1. China's
product quality is improving as it is moving up the value chain (that has been
gone thru by Japan, Korea and briefly the US in the colonial period). Today a
lot of goods that requires cheap labor are assembled (via China's outsource) in
other countries such as Vietnam and Lao.
2. The quality of these should be responsible by
the outsourcers. Does Apple have quality problems from China?
3. As long as the US corporations want higher
profits and do not spare the time in checking quality, product problems will be
here no matter they are from China or any foreign country.
4. China
had saved GM from bankruptcy and also the tourist industry (ask any retailer
who sells luxury goods in NYC).
5. I
wish China will fix the basics first. They are air quality, water quality, food
quality and basic necessities for all such as health care delivery.
6. China
has been dominating for the last 20 centuries except the last three. They
learned and suffered from foreign invasions. I hope they will not bully others
as they were bullied.
7. If
you believe kids will achieve the same in life by spending three extra hours in
playing video games and watching TV more than Chinese or Indian counter parts,
you believe in fairy tales or there is no God. We spend far more money to
educate our students than our counter parts in most Asian countries.
33 The myths of ‘Made in USA’
A
TV network advocates products made in the USA.
Are we cheating ourselves or redefining "Made In
America" when we find out the assembled car here has more foreign parts
than made here for example?
More than 30 years ago, the entire shirt was made in China except the two buttons and the label of "Made in Hong Kong" to get away from American embargo on China. The world has to play according to the US rule but the days are numbered.
More than 30 years ago, the entire shirt was made in China except the two buttons and the label of "Made in Hong Kong" to get away from American embargo on China. The world has to play according to the US rule but the days are numbered.
Fillers:
###
Joke ###
In my first job just after the
Vietnam War, every one tried to date my beautiful office mate Mia except me. If
we married, then her name would be Mia Pow. She would be very popular or very
unpopular without showing her beautiful face. In any case, when she becomes a
mother, she will be Mamma Mia.
### An offensive joke ###
There is a big sign offering escort
service after dark in a Catholic college. My friend called and was furious on
deceptive advertising as he expected the same service offered in Yellow Pages.
###
Chinese music on Youtube
###
On Travel
34 Capitalism & democracy
When we use
communism to describe China’s political system, it is not 100% correct. It
started communism about 60 years ago, but Deng modified it to be socialism with
Chinese characteristics. Now, it is highly capitalistic.
Capitalist-Socialist is a better term to
describe China's political system. However, China is also ruled by a
single party with about a handful of rulers who determine
the next leader every decade. It is consensus rule by a
few within the context of party authoritarianism.
Communism shares food and other stuffs evenly. So, communism encourages laziness and China today is capitalist where its citizens starve if they do not work.
Socialism is in between capitalism and communism. Democracy could lead to socialism, which in turn could lead to self-destruction as demonstrated by Greece today.
What do we call the U.S.? Socialist-Democracy? We have generous welfare and free speech. Some may call it a welfare state.
Western Democracy may not work for countries with low education. It could and have led to corruption as indicated in many Asian countries, past and present.
Communism shares food and other stuffs evenly. So, communism encourages laziness and China today is capitalist where its citizens starve if they do not work.
Socialism is in between capitalism and communism. Democracy could lead to socialism, which in turn could lead to self-destruction as demonstrated by Greece today.
What do we call the U.S.? Socialist-Democracy? We have generous welfare and free speech. Some may call it a welfare state.
Western Democracy may not work for countries with low education. It could and have led to corruption as indicated in many Asian countries, past and present.
To use health
care as a yardstick, China practices capitalism. If you do not pay, you die
literally in the lobby of a hospital. Canada is socialist. Everyone has some
basic form of health care. Many of U.S. states offer free medical care to the
poor and even the illegals, so the U.S. is communist or a welfare state.
Afterthoughts
·
We cannot weigh the
same vote for an educated citizen and a bum. We should have an IQ meter in the
voting booth. Your vote is multiplied with your IQ. In the U.S., your tax
return from last year will be handy too as we should not allow representation
without taxation. Quite extreme even for me but just a thought. J
·
As Uncle Deng said,
“If the cat catches the mouse, I do not care it is black or white”. I see a lot
of holes in the current Chinese system. However, China has lifted millions from
poverty (i.e. starving to death) and just for that it is a good system in my
book.
Deng should get a Nobel Prize for that.
It is better than Obama’s for doing nothing and even before spending
recklessly. Well, the current Nobel Prize committee has become a political
clown who only gives prizes to folks against China. Hope Mr. Nobel would rise
up and give them a hard spank on their stupid heads.
·
The authoritarian
system has some advantages like bulldozing all the houses to give rise to a
highway or a high speed train rail. As long as it is not my house, it is OK. J
·
The problem of the
current system in China.
The central government sets up
good policies. However, the local governments’ top priority is how to sip money
for themselves. The central government should take action on corruption by the
local government and ensure they follow the rules and policies.
·
We spend too much
time in planning, arguing (especially the silly objections between two opposite
parties), lawsuits, financing in a large public project such as the High Speed
Rail (HSR). By the time we start the actual work, the project plan is obsolete
and the landscape has been changed.
BTW, High Speed Rail (HSR) is not
cost effective for the U.S. even though it works in China. As in Business 101,
you need to calculate benefit over cost (i.e. rate of return of the project).
You should select the most cost effect projects first and HSR is not one of
them except for political reasons. We’re
not as densely populated as China. Airlines will compete better than HSR when
the driving distance is more than four hours. In addition, how many workers
want to work in that kind of conditions in laying rails instead of collecting
welfare?
As most if not all big projects in
the U.S. (actually same in most countries) are painted in a very rosy picture
initially and then end up in cost overrun and diminished returns. The Big Dig
project in Boston is one of them and it was full of holes before it was started.
We did not have so many problems on similar projects decades ago even we have
updated technologies and know-hows today. This project has been late,
cost-overrun and unsafe. It is easy to give all concessions and expensive
dinners to everyone as the money is not his. Ronnie did not get the presidency
because of this project even he did not have any control.
·
The corner stone of our capitalistic
system is "Supply and Demand". If you can find a better job, take it.
If you cannot find a better worker, you have to pay more.
That's why we have starving artists as the society does not need their work and that's why we pay accountants and programmers a lot of money relatively. If the rich does not invest (taking risk for the potential profit), there will be no jobs. It is also the catalyst (better wages) to ask folks to study what the society wants instead of what they want. I did not have the luxury of studying the field I really wanted.
Do not blame others but yourselves. Do not treat the rich as parasites. Do not blame China as a 50 cent per hour could be heaven for them. Again it is Supply and Demand.
My classmate wondered why the West wanted to take away his only job as a child labor. He needed that job for buying bread. There are always two sides of a story. Do not force others to follow your ideals. If you do, we have wars.
That's why we have starving artists as the society does not need their work and that's why we pay accountants and programmers a lot of money relatively. If the rich does not invest (taking risk for the potential profit), there will be no jobs. It is also the catalyst (better wages) to ask folks to study what the society wants instead of what they want. I did not have the luxury of studying the field I really wanted.
Do not blame others but yourselves. Do not treat the rich as parasites. Do not blame China as a 50 cent per hour could be heaven for them. Again it is Supply and Demand.
My classmate wondered why the West wanted to take away his only job as a child labor. He needed that job for buying bread. There are always two sides of a story. Do not force others to follow your ideals. If you do, we have wars.
Links
Next Leaders:
Lead to socialism:
35 Could socialism lead to self-destruction?
In 2011, I heard more folks talking about it recently. It is
what is happening in Greece today and to some extent in the U.S.
The major flaw of the U.S. political system is the election every four years, despite its strengths. Our leaders do not plan or care about the longer term. We've more poor than the rich and each has one vote. Hence, the politicians have to be pro poor. However, after the politicians have been elected, they have to pay back to the special interest groups which have funded their campaigns. That's why our democratic system could lead to corruption and self- destruction.
Politicians have to watch out for the benefits / welfare of the poor in order to buy votes. The rich will migrate to other countries where they pay less and fewer taxes and are rewarded for their investment for taking risks. It is the same reason why corporations moving jobs and investments overseas. We have to blame ourselves as we vote to elect our leaders. The middle class are squeezed by both ends.
Most of the recent protesters in Wall Street belong to the unemployed and about 40% of the citizens do not pay any Federal income tax. I do not blame the unemployed due to our economic mess. It is similar to taxation without representation in reverse. The able folks should take jobs with minimal pays (that are being taken by illegal aliens today) and give back some of their entitlements. They have been taking more from the society than giving back for a long time. Welfare and many entitlements are supposed to be a temporary safety net for most.
Greece has illustrated this concept thoroughly. Democratic systems especially the richer countries could lead to socialism and corruption, which in turn could lead to self-destruction. With the world interconnected, it could lead to a global recession.
The major flaw of the U.S. political system is the election every four years, despite its strengths. Our leaders do not plan or care about the longer term. We've more poor than the rich and each has one vote. Hence, the politicians have to be pro poor. However, after the politicians have been elected, they have to pay back to the special interest groups which have funded their campaigns. That's why our democratic system could lead to corruption and self- destruction.
Politicians have to watch out for the benefits / welfare of the poor in order to buy votes. The rich will migrate to other countries where they pay less and fewer taxes and are rewarded for their investment for taking risks. It is the same reason why corporations moving jobs and investments overseas. We have to blame ourselves as we vote to elect our leaders. The middle class are squeezed by both ends.
Most of the recent protesters in Wall Street belong to the unemployed and about 40% of the citizens do not pay any Federal income tax. I do not blame the unemployed due to our economic mess. It is similar to taxation without representation in reverse. The able folks should take jobs with minimal pays (that are being taken by illegal aliens today) and give back some of their entitlements. They have been taking more from the society than giving back for a long time. Welfare and many entitlements are supposed to be a temporary safety net for most.
Greece has illustrated this concept thoroughly. Democratic systems especially the richer countries could lead to socialism and corruption, which in turn could lead to self-destruction. With the world interconnected, it could lead to a global recession.
36 Bad business practices
I have so many bad experiences recently. I bet their
competitors do the same, so I do not want to show the names of the offending
companies if I have an option.
·
My car problem.
I could not take the key from my ignition switch all
the time. It is a new car from one of the two major Japanese car manufacturers.
They honestly acknowledged it was a common problem for my model. After several
unsuccessful fixes and giving me goodies such as free oil change, I called the
service manager and yelled at him it was THEIR problem not mine.
Finally, it was fixed with a solenoid costing about
$5. What a waste of time, theirs and mine. This customer will not be happy and
they still have to spend the $5 plus the oil change and all the free apples I
can pocket. I still have not received my customer satisfaction survey.
·
I received a letter from my one of my funds
asking me to respond so it will not be treated as an abandoned property. The
checks of the dividends and the capital gains must have been cashed by a ghost.
I responded by closing the account.
·
I was lured to another cable company for their
generous offer. I asked my current cable company to match the same deal and
they refused. I switched. Since then and 5 years later, I still received their
junk mails offering better offers I cannot ‘refuse’. Cut down many trees in the
process.
·
My Sunday paper raised the price to $5. It is a
dying industry as I got all my news from TV and the web. I quickly cancelled my
subscription. Since then, they have left many messages and sent me junk mails
almost once a week. If they did not raise the price, I would have stayed with
them. Try to squeeze the last milk from a dying cow.
·
I had a reader telling me to improve my writing
style. I asked him whether he followed the book’s technique to accumulate cash
before the correction in August, 2015. He did not and he is supposed to be a
keen business man. Wrong objective for buying a book on investing!
·
My ‘favorite’ charity called me 8 times for
donations. I will not donate via them again. I hate to be disturbed during
dinner. So are all the phone calls from politician calling for votes and I do
not vote for any of them.
·
My printer needs replacement of inks at least
once every 3 months even I seldom use it. Never buy anything from that company.
·
The ‘new and improved’ upright washers are
problem-prone. My old ones never need repair for over 10 years. So are Yahoo!’s
new ‘improved’ systems. So is Microsoft’s Solitaire – why the ‘improved’ system
takes many, many, many times longer to load as they expect players also own
Xbox. They all lose contact with their own products/customers or their stupid
management tells them to do so.
·
I want to know how all the three market indexes,
oil and gold are doing at least once a day. One major financial web site now
‘hides’ this information in order to show their programmer can do a fancy job
without caring what the customer wants. For me, just switch to another web
site.
·
I almost missed my connecting flight to Boston
in Toronto. First, why I have to clear custom in a foreign country? Second, why
the old process took minutes and this one takes almost an hour. The designer
must have to change the system so s/he can hire more employees or just had too
many drinks during lunch.
·
One luxury hand bag company takes out the logo
on their bags which is why their customers pay premium.
Filler:
### Kings
of California
Due to its huge size, California should be
broken up into two countries. The South and the North are quite different -
some laws worked in the South do not work in the North. I will assign Trump to
the South to fight the nasty Mexicans and myself to the North to enjoy all the
wine and fresh air/water LOL.
No comments:
Post a Comment